Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;20(3):259-261. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001809.
Pediatric procedural sedation has been increasingly performed by pediatric intensivists over the past decade. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship guidelines do not specify how fellows obtain proficiency in pediatric procedural sedation. We sought to survey the state of pediatric procedural sedation training during fellowship and whether fellows thought it was sufficient.
A 21-question survey gathered data on pediatric procedural sedation training provided to Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellows. Surveys were sent to fellowship directors with instructions to distribute to second- and third-year fellows or recent graduates. Over 2 months, up to three e-mail reminders were sent to fellowship directors whose program had not completed at least one survey.
Senior fellows and graduates of 65 active Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship programs.
None.
Sixty-five percent of fellowship programs (42/65) returned at least one response. Ninety senior fellows and 27 recent graduates responded. Of respondents, 38% received pediatric procedural sedation training during the fellowship, and 32% reported mandatory training. Nine percent of programs used simulation. Although 61% who received training felt adequately prepared to perform pediatric procedural sedation, 25% needed additional preceptorship to sedate independently. Nearly one third (31%) reported that completion of a predetermined number of cases was required to sedate independently. Forty-eight percent reported a minimum number of cases was required for hospital credentialing. Nearly 45% were allowed to perform pediatric procedural sedation off the unit after receiving credentials. When asked if inadequate pediatric procedural sedation training would be a deterrent to applying for a position that included pediatric procedural sedation, 8.6% replied yes, 52.6% replied no, and 38.8% replied they were unsure.
Pediatric procedural sedation lacks a clearly defined training pathway. Most fellows find pediatric procedural sedation a valuable skill set. We propose that all Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellows receive training that includes pediatric procedural sedation critical incident simulation and cases performed outside the PICU to establish proficiency.
在过去十年中,儿科重症监护医师越来越多地进行儿科程序镇静。儿科重症监护医学奖学金指南并未具体说明研究员如何获得儿科程序镇静的熟练程度。我们旨在调查奖学金期间儿科程序镇静培训的状况,以及研究员是否认为培训充足。
一项 21 个问题的调查收集了提供给儿科重症监护医学研究员的儿科程序镇静培训数据。向研究员主任发送了调查,并指示他们将调查分发给第二和第三年的研究员或最近的毕业生。在两个月的时间里,向至少未完成一份调查的研究员主任发送了多达三个电子邮件提醒。
65 个活跃的研究生医学教育认证委员会儿科重症监护医学奖学金计划的资深研究员和毕业生。
无。
65%的奖学金计划(42/65)至少回复了一次。90 名资深研究员和 27 名最近的毕业生做出了回应。在回答者中,38%在奖学金期间接受了儿科程序镇静培训,32%报告了强制性培训。9%的计划使用模拟。尽管 61%接受过培训的人认为自己有足够的能力进行儿科程序镇静,但 25%需要额外的指导才能独立镇静。近三分之一(31%)的人报告说,需要完成预定数量的病例才能独立镇静。48%的人报告说,需要进行一定数量的病例才能获得医院的认证。近 45%的人在获得证书后可以在单位外进行儿科程序镇静。当被问及儿科程序镇静培训不足是否会阻止他们申请包含儿科程序镇静的职位时,8.6%的人回答是,52.6%的人回答否,38.8%的人回答不确定。
儿科程序镇静缺乏明确的培训途径。大多数研究员认为儿科程序镇静是一项有价值的技能。我们建议所有儿科重症监护医学研究员都接受培训,包括儿科程序镇静关键事件模拟和在 PICU 外进行的病例,以建立熟练程度。