Suppr超能文献

二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂与吡格列酮联合治疗对比吡格列酮单药治疗2型糖尿病的系统评价与荟萃分析

Comparison of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and pioglitazone combination therapy versus pioglitazone monotherapy in type 2 diabetes: A system review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wang Ben, Sun Yan, Sang Yiquan, Liu Xuekui, Liang Jun

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology and Central Laboratory, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Institute of Medical Sciences, Xuzhou Institute of Diabetes.

The Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University; The Affiliated Xuzhou Central Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine; The Affiliated Xuzhou Hospital of Medical College of Southeast University, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(46):e12633. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012633.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor and pioglitazone combination therapy have been widely used for patients with inadequate glycemic control on monotherapy. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Studies were eligible if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on DPP-4 inhibitor and pioglitazone combination therapy in patients with T2DM through the end of February 2016, using the keywords "alogliptin," "dutogliptin, " "linagliptin," "saxagliptin," "sitagliptin," "vildagliptin," "gliptins," "DPP-4 inhibitor," and "pioglitazone." RCTs were selected if they compared DPP-4 inhibitors and pioglitazone as combination therapy; treatment duration was ≥12 weeks; and the reported data included hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) or fasting plasma glucose (FPG) change, total or any other system Adverse Events (AEs). We estimated effect size with random-effects or fixed-effects meta-analysis, I statistic was used to estimate heterogeneity of results.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs were included. Compared with pioglitazone monotherapy, combination DPP-4 inhibitor and pioglitazone therapy were associated with increased reduction in HbA1c ([MD]-0.64%;-0.73 to -0.55) and FPG ([MD] -0.94; -1.12 to -0.76) levels, more patients in the combination therapy groups versus pioglitazone monotherapy groups had an A1c of < 7% ([OR]2.52; 2.18, 3.17) at the end of the studies, but was not associated with further reduction in higher risk of hypoglycaemia, edema, or any other system AEs. We also noticed that DPP-4 inhibitor and pioglitazone combination therapy were associated with better improvement of pancreatic β-cell function.

CONCLUSIONS

DPP-4 inhibitor and pioglitazone combination therapy provided better glycemic control, both according to HbA1c and FPG levels, than pioglitazone monotherapy. Safety analysis showed well tolerance of combination therapy, even in hypoglycemic and edema AEs. However, additional large-scale, high quality, long-term follow-up clinical trials are necessary to confirm its long-term effectiveness.

摘要

背景

二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂与吡格列酮联合治疗已广泛应用于单药治疗血糖控制不佳的患者。本荟萃分析评估了这种联合治疗对2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane数据库。纳入研究为截至2016年2月底,使用关键词“阿格列汀”、“度格列汀”、“利格列汀”、“沙格列汀”、“西他列汀”、“维格列汀”、“格列汀类”、“DPP-4抑制剂”和“吡格列酮”,针对T2DM患者进行的DPP-4抑制剂与吡格列酮联合治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。若RCT比较了DPP-4抑制剂与吡格列酮联合治疗;治疗持续时间≥12周;且报告的数据包括糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)或空腹血糖(FPG)变化、总体或任何其他系统不良事件(AE),则将其纳入。我们采用随机效应或固定效应荟萃分析估计效应量,用I统计量估计结果的异质性。

结果

纳入7项RCT。与吡格列酮单药治疗相比,DPP-4抑制剂与吡格列酮联合治疗使HbA1c([MD]-0.64%;-0.73至-0.55)和FPG([MD]-0.94;-1.12至-0.76)水平降低幅度更大,联合治疗组与吡格列酮单药治疗组相比,更多患者在研究结束时HbA1c<7%([OR]2.52;2.18,3.17),但与低血糖、水肿或任何其他系统AE的更高风险进一步降低无关。我们还注意到DPP-4抑制剂与吡格列酮联合治疗与胰腺β细胞功能的更好改善相关。

结论

根据HbA1c和FPG水平,DPP-4抑制剂与吡格列酮联合治疗比吡格列酮单药治疗能提供更好的血糖控制。安全性分析显示联合治疗耐受性良好,即使在低血糖和水肿AE方面也是如此。然而,需要更多大规模、高质量、长期随访的临床试验来证实其长期有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验