Mathieu D, Blondel P, Fournier J M, Hebert J P
Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital P. Brousse, Villejuif.
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1988 May;36(5):386-8.
Detection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is still a problem for automated system users. Forty-nine strains were studied--two kinds of tests were performed: the first by using a 1.0 microgram nafcillin disk with the Autobac system, the second by testing an oxacillin disk by diffusion on Mueller-Hinton agar base complemented with natrium chloride incubated at 37 degrees C. Between the two tests, we observed a concordance for 87.8% of the strains. Six strains showed a discrepancy with the reference method. But for five of them, the Light Scattering Index (LSI) showed a decreasing sensibility near for the cut off. Whereas, only one strain is considered as susceptible. The 1.0 micrograms nafcillin disk allow better results than the 5.0 micrograms oxacillin disk in the automated system, Autobac.
对自动化系统用户来说,检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)仍是个问题。我们研究了49株菌株,进行了两种测试:第一种是使用含1.0微克萘夫西林纸片的自动细菌鉴定系统(Autobac系统),第二种是在补充了氯化钠的穆勒-欣顿琼脂培养基上,于37℃孵育,通过扩散法测试苯唑西林纸片。在这两种测试之间,我们观察到87.8%的菌株结果一致。有6株菌株与参考方法存在差异。但其中5株的光散射指数(LSI)在接近临界值时显示敏感性降低。而只有1株被认为是敏感的。在自动细菌鉴定系统Autobac中,1.0微克萘夫西林纸片比5.0微克苯唑西林纸片能得出更好的结果。