O'Connor Alison, Casey Patricia
University College Dublin,Department of Psychiatry,Mater Hospital,63 Eccles St,Dublin 7,Ireland.
Ir J Psychol Med. 2001 Jun;18(2):68-71. doi: 10.1017/S0790966700006364.
There have been concerns in the international literature that the manner in which psychiatry and psychiatric patients is portrayed in the print media is negative and sensational. If correct this has serious implications for the stigma and prejudice that our patients will suffer. This study was designed to evaluate the content and tone of articles relating to psychiatry. It was compared with a broadly similar study published in 1995 and will form the base from which to measure changes in psychiatric coverage over time.
All the daily broadsheets, one daily tabloid and three Sunday broadsheets were examined for a six month period in 1999 and all articles, letters or headlines incorporating psychiatry-related material were examined. Using specific definitions, articles and headlines were examined for tone and content as well as for the contribution of mental health professionals.
Overall 0.65 articles per newspaper per day were found. News items and feature predominated, with forensic issues receiving the greatest attention. The tone of the articles was either neutral or positive and the improvement in the tone of articles in the tabloids was particularly noticeable when compared with an earlier study. This is very different from the findings of international studies. However, the headlines were more sensational in tone than the contents of the articles themselves. Increasingly the opinion of health professionals was sought but contributions from psychiatrists remained low, writing just two articles and constituting 15% of health professionals whose opinions were sought. Nine per cent of items constituted misuse of terms.
The Irish print media are not hostile to psychiatry and there has been an improvement in tone and type of article in the past five years. Greater involvement of psychiatrists in the media and particularly more direct engagement with editors is required if there is to be a shift from coverage of forensic matters in favour of informative articles as well as improvement in the headline tone.
国际文献中一直存在担忧,即平面媒体对精神病学及精神病患者的描述方式是负面且耸人听闻的。如果情况属实,这将对我们的患者所遭受的污名化和偏见产生严重影响。本研究旨在评估与精神病学相关文章的内容和基调。它与1995年发表的一项大致类似的研究进行了比较,并将作为衡量精神病学报道随时间变化的基础。
对1999年为期六个月的所有日报大报、一份日报小报和三份周日报大报进行检查,检查所有包含精神病学相关材料的文章、信件或标题。使用特定定义,对文章和标题的基调、内容以及心理健康专业人员的贡献进行检查。
发现每份报纸每天平均有0.65篇文章。新闻报道和特写占主导,法医问题受到的关注最多。文章的基调要么是中性的,要么是积极的,与早期研究相比,小报文章基调的改善尤为明显。这与国际研究的结果大不相同。然而,标题的基调比文章本身的内容更耸人听闻。越来越多地征求健康专业人员的意见,但精神科医生的投稿仍然很少,仅撰写了两篇文章,占被征求意见的健康专业人员的15%。9%的条目存在术语误用。
爱尔兰平面媒体对精神病学并无敌意,在过去五年中文章的基调及类型已有改善。如果要从报道法医事务转向支持提供信息的文章,并改善标题基调,精神科医生需要更多地参与媒体,特别是与编辑进行更直接的接触。