Morcos Ramez, Al Taii Haider, Bansal Priya, Casale Joel, Manam Rupesh, Patel Vikram, Cioci Anthony, Kucharik Michael, Malhotra Arjun, Maini Brijeshwar
Department of Internal Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.
Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.
J Clin Med. 2018 Nov 14;7(11):441. doi: 10.3390/jcm7110441.
Periprocedural imaging assessment for percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) transcatheter occlusion can be obtained by utilizing different imaging modalities including fluoroscopy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and ultrasound imaging. Given the complex and variable morphology of the left atrial appendage, it is crucial to obtain the most accurate LAA dimensions to prevent intra-procedural device changes, recapture maneuvers, and prolonged procedure time. We therefore sought to examine the accuracy of the most commonly utilized imaging modalities in LAA occlusion. Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was waived as we only reviewed published data. By utilizing PUBMED which is an integrated online website to list the published literature based on its relevance, we retrieved thirty-two articles on the accuracy of most commonly used imaging modalities for pre-procedural assessment of the left atrial appendage morphology, namely, two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography, three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography, and three-dimensional printing. There is strong evidence that real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography is more accurate than two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Three-dimensional computed tomography has recently emerged as an imaging modality and it showed exceptional accuracy when merged with three-dimensional printing technology. However, real time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography may be considered the preferred imaging modality as it can provide accurate measurements without requiring radiation exposure or contrast administration. We will present the most common imaging modality used for LAA assessment and will provide an algorithmic approach including preprocedural, periprocedural, intraprocedural, and postprocedural.
经皮左心耳(LAA)导管封堵术的围手术期成像评估可通过使用不同的成像方式来获得,包括荧光透视、磁共振成像(MRI)、计算机断层扫描(CT)和超声成像。鉴于左心耳形态复杂且多变,获取最准确的左心耳尺寸对于防止术中器械更换、重新抓捕操作以及延长手术时间至关重要。因此,我们试图研究左心耳封堵术中最常用成像方式的准确性。由于我们仅回顾已发表的数据,故无需机构审查委员会(IRB)批准。通过利用PUBMED(一个基于相关性列出已发表文献的综合在线网站),我们检索了32篇关于左心耳形态术前评估最常用成像方式准确性的文章,即二维经食管超声心动图、三维经食管超声心动图、计算机断层扫描和三维打印。有充分证据表明实时三维经食管超声心动图比二维经食管超声心动图更准确。三维计算机断层扫描最近已成为一种成像方式,并且当与三维打印技术结合时显示出极高的准确性。然而,实时三维经食管超声心动图可被视为首选成像方式,因为它无需辐射暴露或造影剂注射就能提供准确测量。我们将介绍用于左心耳评估的最常见成像方式,并提供一种算法方法,包括术前、围手术期、术中及术后。