Navrátil Jiří, Payne Jan, Calda Pavel
Cas Lek Cesk. 2018 Summer;157(3):152-154.
The new legislation, in particular the General Regulation on Personal Data Protection (GDPR), constitutes relatively demanding criteria on healthcare. However, the institute of medical secrets, which is an ancient medical practice and is part of various legal and professional regulations, contains many elements of today's protection of personal data and is not new among the professional medical public. Under the GDPR, however, there are steps that can be labelled as at least controversial. Such disputable measures have recently been to introduce electronic queue management systems, as we know from post offices. They are not a necessary measure for the protection of personal data in the waiting rooms of ambulances, they are not required by law, even with regard to GDPR and from the point of view of medical ethics are even at least problematic. If GDPR is applied in a similar way, it does not really benefit from the protection of personal data, and a useful tool like GDPR will be undoubtedly discredited. Keywords: electronic queue management systems, GDPR, medical ethics, personal data protection, patient.
新法规，尤其是《通用数据保护条例》（GDPR），对医疗保健提出了相对苛刻的标准。然而，医疗保密制度作为一种古老的医疗惯例，是各种法律和专业法规的一部分，包含了当今个人数据保护的许多要素，在专业医疗界并不新鲜。然而，根据GDPR，有些措施至少可以说是有争议的。最近这类有争议的措施是引入电子排队管理系统，就像我们在邮局看到的那样。在救护车候诊室，它们并非保护个人数据的必要措施，法律也未要求使用，即便考虑到GDPR，从医学伦理角度看至少也是有问题的。如果以类似方式应用GDPR，个人数据保护并不会真正从中受益，像GDPR这样有用的工具无疑会名誉扫地。关键词：电子排队管理系统、GDPR、医学伦理、个人数据保护、患者
