• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

政府社会援助计划未能保护低收入人群的健康:来自美国和加拿大的证据(2003-2014 年)。

Government social assistance programmes are failing to protect the health of low-income populations: evidence from the USA and Canada (2003-2014).

机构信息

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Economics, Glendon College, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Mar;73(3):198-205. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211351. Epub 2018 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1136/jech-2018-211351
PMID:30442818
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Social policies that improve the availability and distribution of key socioeconomic resources such as income, wealth and employment are believed to present the most promising avenue for reducing health inequalities. The present study aims to estimate the effect of social assistance recipiency on the health of low-income earners in the USA and Canada.

METHODS

Drawing on nationally representative survey data (National Health Interview Survey and the Canadian Community Health Survey), we employed propensity score matching to match recipients of social assistance to comparable sets of non-recipient 'controls'. Using a variety of matching algorithms, we estimated the treatment effect of social assistance recipiency on self-rated health, chronic conditions, hypertension, obesity, smoking, binge drinking and physical inactivity.

RESULTS

After accounting for underlying differences in the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of recipients and non-recipients, we found that social assistance recipiency was associated with worse health status or, at best, the absence of a clear health advantage. This finding was consistent across several different matching strategies and a diverse range of health outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

From a public health perspective, our findings suggest that interventions are warranted to improve the scope and generosity of existing social assistance programmes. This may include reversing welfare reforms implemented over the past several decades, increasing benefit levels and untethering benefit recipiency from stringent work conditionalities.

摘要

背景

改善收入、财富和就业等关键社会经济资源的可及性和分配的社会政策,被认为是减少健康不平等的最有希望的途径。本研究旨在估计美国和加拿大的社会救助领取对低收入者健康的影响。

方法

利用全国代表性调查数据(国家健康访谈调查和加拿大社区健康调查),我们采用倾向评分匹配将社会救助的领取者与可比的非领取者“对照组”相匹配。使用多种匹配算法,我们估计了社会救助领取对自我评估健康、慢性疾病、高血压、肥胖、吸烟、狂饮和身体活动不足的治疗效果。

结果

在考虑到领取者和非领取者在人口统计学和社会经济特征方面的潜在差异后,我们发现社会救助领取与较差的健康状况相关,或者充其量是缺乏明确的健康优势。这一发现与几种不同的匹配策略和多种不同的健康结果一致。

结论

从公共卫生的角度来看,我们的研究结果表明,有必要干预以扩大和增加现有的社会援助计划的范围和慷慨程度。这可能包括扭转过去几十年实施的福利改革,提高福利水平,并取消对严格工作条件的福利领取者的限制。

相似文献

1
Government social assistance programmes are failing to protect the health of low-income populations: evidence from the USA and Canada (2003-2014).政府社会援助计划未能保护低收入人群的健康:来自美国和加拿大的证据(2003-2014 年)。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Mar;73(3):198-205. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211351. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
2
The impact of social assistance programs on population health: a systematic review of research in high-income countries.社会援助计划对人口健康的影响:高收入国家研究的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 3;19(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6337-1.
3
Does government assistance improve utilization of eye care services by low-income individuals?政府援助能否提高低收入人群对眼部护理服务的利用率?
Can J Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;49(4):320-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
4
Immigrant welfare recipiency: recent trends and future implications.移民福利领取情况:近期趋势及未来影响
Contemp Policy Issues. 1992 Apr;10(2):44-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7287.1992.tb00224.x.
5
Is social assistance boosting the health of the poor? Results from Ontario and three countries.社会援助是否能改善贫困人口的健康状况?安大略省及三个国家的研究结果。
Can J Public Health. 2019 Aug;110(4):386-394. doi: 10.17269/s41997-019-00206-3. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
6
The effect of unemployment benefits on health: A propensity score analysis.失业救济金对健康的影响:倾向评分分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:198-206. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.047. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
7
Do interventions to increase income improve the health of the poor in developed economies and are such policies cost effective?提高收入的干预措施能否改善发达经济体贫困人口的健康状况,此类政策是否具有成本效益?
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2004;3(2):115-20. doi: 10.2165/00148365-200403020-00008.
8
Heat or eat: the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program and nutritional and health risks among children less than 3 years of age.取暖还是吃饭:低收入家庭能源援助计划与3岁以下儿童的营养和健康风险
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):e1293-302. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2943.
9
[Inequalities in health in Italy].[意大利的健康不平等现象]
Epidemiol Prev. 2004 May-Jun;28(3 Suppl):i-ix, 1-161.
10
Estimates of prevalence, demographic characteristics and social factors among people with disabilities in the USA: a cross-survey comparison.美国残疾人的患病率、人口特征及社会因素估计:一项跨调查比较
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 14;8(2):e017828. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017828.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of social assistance on self-rated health.社会救助对自评健康的影响。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 20;10:918323. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.918323. eCollection 2022.