Caiazzo Antonio, Cardano Mario, Cois Ester, Costa Giuseppe, Marinacci Chiara, Spadea Teresa, Vannoni Francesca, Venturini Lorenzo
Dipartimento di sanità pubblica e microbiologia, Università di Torino.
Epidemiol Prev. 2004 May-Jun;28(3 Suppl):i-ix, 1-161.
Socioeconomic inequality and its impact on health is a growing concern in the European public health debate. In many countries, the issue is moving away from description towards the identification of the determinants of inequalities and the development of policies explicitly aimed at reducing inequalities in health. In Italy, ten years after the publication of the first report on inequalities in health, this topic is seldom present on the agenda of public policy makers. The purpose of this report is to update the Italian profile of social variation in health and health care in order to stimulate the debate on ways to tackle inequalities in health that are preventable. In the first section of this book, the threefold objective is to describe the principal mechanisms involved in the generation of social inequalities in health (Introduction); to report Italian data on the distribution and magnitude of this phenomenon in the last decade; and to evaluate policies and interventions in both the social (chapter 1.9, Section I) and the health sector (chapter 2.3, Section I), which are potentially useful to reduce health inequalities. It is intended for anyone who is in a position to contribute t o decision-making that will benefit the health of communities. For this reason, chapters are organized by specific determinants of inequalities on which interentions may have an impact. The methodological approach in the second section focuses on the best methods to monitor social inequalities including recommendations on social indicators, sources of information and study models, based on European guidelines revised for the Italian situation. According to data from national and local studies, mortality increases linearly with social disadvantage for a wide range of indicators at both the individual (education, social class, income, quality of housing) and the geographical level (deprivation indexes computed at different levels of aggregation). This positive correlation is evident for both sexes, with the steepest gradient observed among adults of working age, although differences persist also among the elderly. The causes of death found to be most highly correlated with social inequality, and largely responsible for the increasing inequality over the last decade, are those associated with addiction and exclusion (drug, alcohol and violence related deaths), with smoking (lung cancer) and with safety in the workplace and on the roads (accidents). Similar gradients and trends have been observed with different outcomes, such as self-reported morbidity, disability and cancer incidence (chapter 1.1, Section I). Reproductive outcomes confiirm this picture: compared to women belonging to the upper classes, those women in low conditions experience more spontaneous abortions and their children suffer from higher infant mortality and low birth weight. This is a critical issue since poor infant health, particularly for metabolic and respiratory pathologies, affects health in adult life. There is now substantive evidence showing that also socioeconomic circumstances at birth or during adolescence may have a strong impact on adult health (chapter 1.2, Section I). Differences in harmful lifestyles, such as smoking, heavy drinking, drug use, unhealthy diet, obesity and physical inactivity, have a similar effect. The only exception is smoking among women, which is positively correlated with socioeconomic status; however, since women in the upper classes have a greater tendency to quit smoking, the gradient will soon be reversed (chapter 1.7, Section I). On the other hand, most of these behaviours do not follow from free and conscious individual choice; they are a form of adaptation to chronic stress originating in the work-place (chapter 1.4, Section I), or to particularly unfavourable events and conditions, such as unemployment (chapter 1.5, Section I) or lack of family and social support (chapter 1.6, Section I). Poor socioeconomic circumstances are the threshold of absolute poverty and may lead to social exclusion, a condition with a heavy impact on health, which in Italy includes marginal groups of the native population and broader classes of immigrants (chapter 1.3, Section I). Finally, there is recent and consistent evidence on the existence of a "contextual" effect on health, as opposed to the "compositional" effect given solely by the aggregation of individual processes. According to this hypothesis, characteristics of the infrastructure, and the physical and socioeconomic environment of an area would have an impact on individual health independent from the cultural and economic resources personally available to people living in that area (chapter 1.8, Section I). With respect to the health care system, various studies are in agreement in demonstrating that poor and less educated people have inadequate access both to primary prevention and early diagnosis (chapter 2.1, Section I), and to early and appropriate care (chapter 2.2, Section I). They also experience higher rates of hospitalization, particularly in emergencies and with advanced levels of severity.
社会经济不平等及其对健康的影响在欧洲公共卫生辩论中日益受到关注。在许多国家,这个问题正从描述转向确定不平等的决定因素,并制定明确旨在减少健康不平等的政策。在意大利,自第一份关于健康不平等的报告发布十年后,这个话题在公共政策制定者的议程上很少出现。本报告的目的是更新意大利健康和医疗保健方面的社会差异情况,以激发关于如何解决可预防的健康不平等问题的辩论。在本书的第一部分,有三个目标:描述健康方面社会不平等产生所涉及的主要机制(引言);报告意大利过去十年中这一现象的分布和程度的数据;评估社会部门(第一章第9节,第一部分)和卫生部门(第二章第3节,第一部分)中可能有助于减少健康不平等的政策和干预措施。本书面向任何能够为有利于社区健康的决策做出贡献的人。因此,各章按不平等的具体决定因素组织,干预措施可能会对这些因素产生影响。第二部分的方法论侧重于监测社会不平等的最佳方法,包括根据针对意大利情况修订的欧洲指南,对社会指标、信息来源和研究模型的建议。根据国家和地方研究的数据,在个体层面(教育、社会阶层、收入、住房质量)和地理层面(在不同汇总水平计算的贫困指数)的广泛指标上,死亡率随着社会劣势呈线性增加。这种正相关在两性中都很明显,在工作年龄的成年人中观察到的梯度最陡,尽管老年人之间也存在差异。发现与社会不平等高度相关且在很大程度上导致过去十年不平等加剧的死亡原因,是与成瘾和排斥相关的原因(与毒品、酒精和暴力相关的死亡)、与吸烟相关的原因(肺癌)以及与工作场所和道路安全相关的原因(事故)。在不同结果方面也观察到了类似的梯度和趋势,如自我报告的发病率、残疾和癌症发病率(第一章第1节,第一部分)。生殖结果证实了这种情况:与上层阶级的女性相比,处于低社会经济状况的女性经历更多的自然流产,她们的孩子患婴儿死亡率更高且出生体重低。这是一个关键问题,因为婴儿健康不佳,特别是对于代谢和呼吸道疾病,会影响成年后的健康。现在有大量证据表明,出生时或青春期的社会经济状况也可能对成年健康产生重大影响(第一章第2节,第一部分)。有害生活方式的差异,如吸烟、酗酒、吸毒、不健康饮食、肥胖和缺乏体育活动,也有类似的影响。唯一的例外是女性吸烟,它与社会经济地位呈正相关;然而,由于上层阶级的女性戒烟的倾向更大,这种梯度很快就会逆转(第一章第7节,第一部分)。另一方面,这些行为大多并非源于自由和有意识的个人选择;它们是对工作场所产生的慢性压力(第一章第4节,第一部分)或特别不利的事件和状况(如失业,第一章第5节,第一部分)或缺乏家庭和社会支持(第一章第6节,第一部分)的一种适应形式。社会经济状况不佳是绝对贫困的门槛,可能导致社会排斥,这一状况对健康有重大影响,在意大利包括本地人口的边缘群体和更广泛的移民群体(第一章第3节,第一部分)。最后,最近有一致的证据表明存在对健康的“背景”影响,这与仅由个体过程汇总产生的“构成”影响相反。根据这一假设,一个地区的基础设施、自然和社会经济环境的特征将对个体健康产生影响,而与居住在该地区的人们个人可获得的文化和经济资源无关(第一章第8节,第一部分)。关于医疗保健系统,各种研究一致表明,贫困和受教育程度较低的人在获得初级预防和早期诊断(第二章第1节,第一部分)以及早期和适当治疗(第二章第2节,第一部分)方面存在不足。他们的住院率也更高,特别是在紧急情况下和严重程度较高时。