• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为 2020 年医疗改革做准备:共和党人改进州级创新方法的选择。

Getting Ready For Health Reform 2020: Republicans' Options For Improving Upon The State Innovation Approach.

机构信息

Lanhee J. Chen is the David and Diane Steffy Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution and director of domestic policy studies and a lecturer in the Public Policy Program at Stanford University, in California.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Dec;37(12):2076-2083. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05119. Epub 2018 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05119
PMID:30444425
Abstract

The 2020 presidential election will be consequential for the future of health reform, with the two major-party nominees taking very different views on the future of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), as well as the policies needed to lower health costs and continue to expand access to coverage. The Republican nominee will likely signal broad opposition to the ACA and a desire to replace it with a state innovation-based approach to reform, based on the Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson legislation considered by the Senate in the fall of 2017. This article takes that legislation as a starting point, contextualizes it within the broader health reform discussion, and suggests ways to improve upon it to enhance the affordability of and access to coverage and to ensure that states have adequate flexibility to implement their policy goals.

摘要

2020 年总统大选对医改的未来将产生重大影响,两大主要政党的候选人对《平价医疗法案》(ACA)的未来以及降低医疗成本和继续扩大保险覆盖范围所需的政策持截然不同的看法。共和党候选人可能会表示强烈反对 ACA,并希望用一种基于州创新的改革方法来取代它,这种方法基于 2017 年秋季参议院审议的《格雷厄姆-卡西迪-海勒-约翰逊法案》。本文以该法案为起点,将其置于更广泛的医改讨论背景下,并提出了一些改进建议,以提高保险的负担能力和可及性,并确保各州有足够的灵活性来实现其政策目标。

相似文献

1
Getting Ready For Health Reform 2020: Republicans' Options For Improving Upon The State Innovation Approach.为 2020 年医疗改革做准备:共和党人改进州级创新方法的选择。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Dec;37(12):2076-2083. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05119. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
2
The Affordable Care Act: How Nixon's Health Reform Proposal Became Democrats' Albatross.平价医疗法案:尼克松的医改提案如何成为民主党的累赘。
Int J Health Serv. 2017 Oct;47(4):612-620. doi: 10.1177/0020731417729661. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
3
A Critical Analysis of Obamacare: Affordable Care or Insurance for Many and Coverage for Few?对奥巴马医改的批判性分析:是可承受的医疗保健,还是惠及多数人的保险和少数人的覆盖范围?
Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):111-138.
4
Republican States Bolstered Their Health Insurance Rate Review Programs Using Incentives From the Affordable Care Act.共和党州利用《平价医疗法案》的激励措施加强了他们的健康保险费率审查计划。
Inquiry. 2015 Sep 21;52. doi: 10.1177/0046958015604164. Print 2015.
5
Business of Health: Business of Health Insurance.健康业务:健康保险业务。
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2017 Dec 26;2017:1-105.
6
How Democratic Candidates For The Presidency In 2020 Could Choose Among Public Health Insurance Plans.2020 年美国总统大选候选人如何在公共医疗保险计划中做出选择。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Dec;37(12):2084-2091. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05082. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
7
The Art of Repeal - Republicans' Health Care Reform Muddle.废除的艺术——共和党人医保改革的混乱局面
N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 20;376(16):1497-1499. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1703980. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
8
The Graham-Cassidy Plan - The Most Harmful ACA-Repeal Bill Yet.格雷厄姆-卡西迪计划——迄今为止最具危害性的废除《平价医疗法案》法案。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 19;377(16):e23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1712614. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
9
The Arc Of History Bends Toward Coverage: Health Policy At A Crossroads.历史的轨迹趋向于普及:处于十字路口的健康政策。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Mar;37(3):351-357. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1312.
10
Health care reform after the ACA.《平价医疗法案》之后的医疗保健改革。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 12;370(24):2259-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1404298. Epub 2014 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Implications of Post-ACA Health Reform on State Health Care Policy.《后 ACA 时代医改对州级医疗政策的长期影响》
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(3):775-778. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06168-4. Epub 2020 Sep 8.