• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估发表于颅面外科杂志的随机对照试验对CONSORT声明的依从性。

Assessing the Compliance of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Craniofacial Surgery Journals With the CONSORT Statement.

作者信息

Borrelli Mimi R, Farwana Reem, Andrew Tom W, Chicco Maria, Abukhder Munir, Mobarak Dima, Thavayogan Rachel, Agha Riaz, Pidgeon Thomas E

机构信息

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.

School of Medical Education, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.

出版信息

J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Jan;30(1):96-104. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004900.

DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000004900
PMID:30444780
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are gold standard assessments for healthcare interventions. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement was published to maximize RCT reporting transparency. The authors conducted a systematic review to assess current compliance of RCTs published within craniofacial surgery with the CONSORT statement.

METHODS

The Thomson Reuters Impact Factor Report 2016 was consulted to identify craniofacial surgery journals. PubMed was used to search for recent RCTs published within the 5 journals identified. Two independent researchers assessed each study for inclusion and performed data extraction. The primary outcome was compliance of each RCT with the CONSORT statement. Secondary outcomes were the pathology and interventions examined, impact factor, multi-versus-single center, number of authors, and publication date.

RESULTS

Eighty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, across which a median of 56% (range 33%-94%) applicable CONSORT items were reported. The 5 least reported items were: trial design (3a); registration number and name of trial registry (23); who generated random allocation sequences, enrolled participants, and assigned participants to interventions (10); sample size determination (7a); mentioning "randomized trial" in the title (1a).

CONCLUSION

The compliance of craniofacial surgery RCTs with the CONSORT statement requires improvement. Areas in need are identified, and methods to improve reporting transparency, are discussed.

摘要

背景

随机对照试验(RCTs)是医疗保健干预措施的金标准评估方法。《试验报告统一标准》(CONSORT)声明已发布,以最大限度地提高RCT报告的透明度。作者进行了一项系统评价,以评估颅面外科领域发表的RCTs目前对CONSORT声明的依从性。

方法

查阅《2016年汤森路透期刊影响因子报告》以确定颅面外科期刊。使用PubMed在确定的5种期刊中搜索近期发表的RCTs。两名独立研究人员评估每项研究是否纳入并进行数据提取。主要结果是每项RCT对CONSORT声明的依从性。次要结果是所研究的病理学和干预措施、影响因子、多中心与单中心、作者数量以及发表日期。

结果

86项研究符合纳入标准,其中报告的适用CONSORT项目中位数为56%(范围33%-94%)。报告最少的5个项目是:试验设计(3a);试验注册号和试验注册名称(23);谁生成随机分配序列、招募参与者并将参与者分配至干预措施(10);样本量确定(7a);标题中提及“随机试验”(1a)。

结论

颅面外科RCTs对CONSORT声明的依从性需要提高。确定了需要改进的领域,并讨论了提高报告透明度的方法。

相似文献

1
Assessing the Compliance of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Craniofacial Surgery Journals With the CONSORT Statement.评估发表于颅面外科杂志的随机对照试验对CONSORT声明的依从性。
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Jan;30(1):96-104. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004900.
2
An assessment of the compliance of Randomised controlled trials published in craniofacial surgery journals with the CONSORT statement: A systematic review protocol.评估发表在颅面外科杂志上的随机对照试验对CONSORT声明的依从性:一项系统评价方案。
Int J Surg Protoc. 2017 Jun 5;5:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.isjp.2017.06.001. eCollection 2017.
3
An assessment of the compliance of randomized controlled trials published in two high impact journals with the CONSORT statement.对发表于两份高影响力期刊的随机对照试验与CONSORT声明的依从性评估。
Natl Med J India. 2018 Mar-Apr;31(2):79-82. doi: 10.4103/0970-258X.253165.
4
Endorsement for improving the quality of reports on randomized controlled trials of traditional medicine journals in Korea: a systematic review.提高韩国传统医学期刊随机对照试验报告质量的认可:一项系统评价
Trials. 2014 Nov 5;15:429. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-429.
5
The reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery: a systematic review.外科随机对照试验的报告质量:一项系统评价。
Int J Surg. 2007 Dec;5(6):413-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.06.002. Epub 2007 Oct 29.
6
CONSORT in China: past development and future direction.中国的CONSORT:过去的发展与未来的方向。
Trials. 2015 Jun 1;16:243. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0769-z.
7
Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials from two leading cancer journals using the CONSORT statement.使用CONSORT声明评估两份顶尖癌症期刊中随机对照试验的质量。
Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2008 Jan-Mar;1(1):38-43. doi: 10.1016/s1658-3876(08)50059-8.
8
Quality of reporting of modern randomized controlled trials in medical oncology: a systematic review.现代肿瘤医学随机对照试验报告质量的系统评价。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Jul 3;104(13):982-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs259.
9
Assessment of the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in otorhinolaryngologic literature - adherence to the CONSORT statement.耳鼻喉科文献中随机对照试验报告质量的评估——对CONSORT声明的遵守情况
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0122328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122328. eCollection 2015.
10
Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals.随机对照试验摘要的质量自 CONSORT 报告规范发布后是否有所提高?对四本知名麻醉学期刊的调查。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jul;28(7):485-92. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833fb96f.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Harms Reporting Quality in Randomized Controlled Trials of Aesthetic Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review.鼻整形随机对照试验中危害报告质量的评估:一项系统评价
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024 Jul 22;6:ojae057. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojae057. eCollection 2024.
2
Outcome measures reported following feminizing genital gender affirmation surgery for transgender women and gender diverse individuals: A systematic review.变性女性和性别多样化个体女性化生殖器性别确认手术后报告的结局指标:一项系统综述。
Int J Transgend Health. 2022 Dec 1;24(2):149-173. doi: 10.1080/26895269.2022.2147117. eCollection 2023.
3
A multiyear systematic survey of the quality of reporting for randomised trials in dentistry, neurology and geriatrics published in journals of Spain and Latin America.
一项针对在西班牙和拉丁美洲期刊上发表的牙科学、神经病学和老年病学随机试验报告质量的多年系统调查。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jul 26;21(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01337-3.
4
Compliance of Published Randomized Controlled Trials on the Effect of Physical Activity on Primary Dysmenorrhea with the Consortium's Integrated Report on Clinical Trials Statement: A Critical Appraisal of the Literature.已发表的关于体育活动对原发性痛经影响的随机对照试验与该联盟临床试验综合报告声明的合规性:文献的批判性评价
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2020 Nov 7;25(6):445-454. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_223_19. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.
5
Writing the methods section.撰写方法部分。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;13(Suppl 1):S20-S22. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_805_18.