Postgraduate Program in Tropical Medicine, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Nov 16;12(11):e0006868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006868. eCollection 2018 Nov.
ARFI elastrography has been used as a noninvasive method to assess the severity of liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis, although with few studies in schistosomiasis mansoni. We aimed to evaluate the performance of point shear wave elastography (pSWE) for predicting significant periportal fibrosis (PPF) in schistosomotic patients and to determine its best cutoff point.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: This cross-sectional study included 358 adult schistosomotic patients subjected to US and pSWE on the right lobe. Two hundred two patients (62.0%) were women, with a median age of 54 (ranging 18-92) years. The pSWE measurements were compared to the US patterns of PPF, as gold standard, according to the Niamey classification. The performance of pSWE was calculated as the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Patients were further classified into two groups: 86 patients with mild PPF and 272 patients with significant PPF. The median pSWE of the significant fibrosis group was higher (1.40 m/s) than that of mild fibrosis group (1.14 m/s, p<0.001). AUC was 0.719 with ≤1.11 m/s as the best cutoff value for excluding significant PPF. Sensitivity and negative predictive values were 80.5% and 40.5%, respectively. Whereas, for confirming significant PPF, the best cutoff value was >1.39 m/s, with specificity of 86.1% and positive predictive value of 92.0%.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: pSWE was able to differentiate significant from mild PPF, with better performance to predict significant PPF.
声辐射力脉冲弹性成像(ARFI 弹性成像)已被用作一种非侵入性方法来评估病毒性肝炎中肝纤维化的严重程度,尽管在曼氏血吸虫病中研究较少。我们旨在评估点剪切波弹性成像(pSWE)预测血吸虫病患者门静脉周围纤维化(PPF)的性能,并确定其最佳截断点。
方法/主要发现:这项横断面研究纳入了 358 名接受右叶超声和 pSWE 检查的成年血吸虫病患者。202 名患者(62.0%)为女性,中位年龄为 54 岁(18-92 岁)。pSWE 测量结果与 US 显示的 PPF 模式(金标准)进行比较,根据尼亚美分类。pSWE 的性能通过 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)来计算。患者进一步分为两组:86 名轻度 PPF 患者和 272 名重度 PPF 患者。重度纤维化组的 pSWE 中位数(1.40 m/s)高于轻度纤维化组(1.14 m/s,p<0.001)。AUC 为 0.719,以≤1.11 m/s 作为排除重度 PPF 的最佳截断值。敏感性和阴性预测值分别为 80.5%和 40.5%。而对于确认重度 PPF,最佳截断值为>1.39 m/s,特异性为 86.1%,阳性预测值为 92.0%。
结论/意义:pSWE 能够区分重度和轻度 PPF,在预测重度 PPF 方面表现更好。