Veterinary Pharmacology/Toxicology, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa.
Veterinary Pathology, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa.
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Dec;64:181-186. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
Diclofenac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory pharmaceutical agent was responsible for the death of millions of Gyps vulture's in the Indian sub-region with the safety of the other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) being questionable. With preclinical safety testing not well established for avian species unlike for mammalian and environmental toxicity, we ask the question if a preclinical model could have predicted the toxic effect of the drug. For this study, we test an Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guideline 223 for assessing the acute toxic potential of pesticides in birds by exposing three avian species to the drug. Exposed Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica) and Muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata) demonstrated clinical signs and pathology similar to those previously reported in vultures viz. hyperuricemia, depression, death, visceral gout and nephrosis. However, exposed domestic pigeons (Columba livia domestica) were insensitive. Following a pharmacokinetic analysis, the drug was well absorbed and distributed in the pigeons with a half-life below 6 h. A toxicokinetic evaluation in quails showed poisoning was due to metabolic constraint, with a half-life and mean residence time above 6 h and 8 h respectively resulting in death. Toxicity seen in the ducks was however not related to metabolic constraint but hyperuricemia as metabolism was rapid [half-life (1-2 h) and mean residence time (2-3 h)] irrespective of survival or death. Despite succumbing to diclofenac, the established oral median lethal dose (LD) of 405.42 mg/kg and 189.92 mg/kg in Japanese quails and Muscovy ducks respectively from this study were substantially higher than those reported for Gyps vultures (0.098 mg/kg) which is as a result of the rapid elimination of the drug from the body in the former species. More importantly, it suggests that these species are not suitable as surrogates for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug toxicity testing and that the toxicity of diclofenac in vultures is idiosyncratic most likely as a result of species specific metabolism.
双氯芬酸是一种非甾体抗炎药,导致印度次大陆数百万只食腐秃鹫死亡,其他非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)的安全性也受到质疑。由于与哺乳动物和环境毒性相比,禽类的临床前安全性测试尚未得到很好的建立,我们不禁要问,是否有临床前模型可以预测这种药物的毒性作用。在这项研究中,我们按照经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的 223 号准则,用该药物暴露于三种鸟类,来评估农药对鸟类的急性毒性。暴露于双氯芬酸的日本鹌鹑(Coturnix japonica)和麝香鸭(Cairina moschata)表现出了与先前秃鹫报道的相似的临床症状和病理学特征,即高尿酸血症、抑郁、死亡、内脏痛风和肾病。然而,暴露于双氯芬酸的家鸽(Columba livia domestica)则没有表现出敏感性。在进行药代动力学分析后,双氯芬酸在鸽子体内被很好地吸收和分布,半衰期低于 6 小时。鹌鹑的毒代动力学评估表明,中毒是由于代谢受限,半衰期和平均停留时间分别超过 6 小时和 8 小时,导致死亡。然而,鸭子的毒性与代谢限制无关,而是与高尿酸血症有关,因为代谢很快[半衰期(1-2 小时)和平均停留时间(2-3 小时)],无论是否存活或死亡。尽管食腐秃鹫对双氯芬酸敏感,但本研究中日本鹌鹑和麝香鸭的口服半数致死剂量(LD)分别为 405.42mg/kg 和 189.92mg/kg,明显高于先前报道的食腐秃鹫(0.098mg/kg),这是因为在前一种物种中,药物从体内迅速消除。更重要的是,这表明这些物种不适合作为非甾体抗炎药毒性测试的替代物,并且食腐秃鹫对双氯芬酸的毒性是特殊的,很可能是由于物种特异性的代谢。