Department of Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca 14853.
Perry Veterinary Clinic, Perry, NY 14530.
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Jan;102(1):578-594. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15062. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
Culture-negative and Escherichia coli cases are uncommonly treated in pathogen-based protocols for nonsevere mastitis. High-throughput 16S rRNA sequencing might reveal the presence of other pathogens and can provide information on microbial diversity. The objective was to explore the milk microbiome at the time of the mastitis event (enrollment) and its association with survival in the herd, milk production, and postevent linear score (LS) for cows with clinical mastitis characterized as negative or E. coli by culture. Fifty E. coli-positive and 35 culture-negative samples from cases were enrolled. No cases were treated with antimicrobials. All E. coli-positive quarters were characterized as transient; microbiological culture of samples taken 15 d postmastitis were negative for this organism. However, a difference in α-diversity (Shannon index) was present between enrollment and follow-up samples (3.8 vs. 5.1). When α-diversity was explored for enrollment E. coli samples, no relationship was observed between the Shannon indices of these samples and postmastitis LS. Alpha-diversity of the enrollment samples was lower for E. coli-positive cows that subsequently had greater losses in milk production. This difference was explained by a greater relative abundance of the family Enterobacteriaceae (67.8 vs. 38.4%) for cows that dropped in production. Analysis of composition of the microbiome identified one phylum, Proteobacteria, that differed between E. coli-positive cows that dropped in production and those that did not. Evaluation of β -diversity found no statistical relationship between postmastitis LS and the microbiome. When evaluating α- and β-diversities and composition of the microbiomes for culture-negative quarters, no associations were found for milk production changes and postmastitis LS. Three cows did not remain in the herd, limiting the ability to analyze survival. The findings suggest that a contributing factor to negative outcomes in E. coli-positive cows is relative abundance of this pathogen, and that no single or collective group of bacterial families is associated with milk production changes or postmastitis LS in culture-negative quarters. Although additional studies should be performed, the absence of associations between outcomes explored and microbial profiles in this study suggests that we are not missing opportunities by not treating nonsevere E. coli or culture-negative mastitis cases.
文化阴性和大肠杆菌病例在非严重乳腺炎的基于病原体的方案中不常见治疗。高通量 16S rRNA 测序可能揭示其他病原体的存在,并提供微生物多样性的信息。目的是探索乳腺炎事件时(入组)的牛奶微生物组及其与牛群存活、牛奶产量和乳腺炎后线性评分(LS)的关系,这些乳腺炎的特征是培养阴性或大肠杆菌。从病例中纳入了 50 个大肠杆菌阳性和 35 个培养阴性样本。未对病例进行抗生素治疗。所有大肠杆菌阳性的象限都被描述为一过性;乳腺炎后 15 天采集的样本的微生物培养对该生物体呈阴性。然而,在入组和随访样本之间存在 α 多样性(香农指数)的差异(3.8 对 5.1)。当探索入组大肠杆菌样本的 α 多样性时,未观察到这些样本的香农指数与乳腺炎后 LS 之间存在关系。随后牛奶产量下降的大肠杆菌阳性牛的入组样本的 α 多样性较低。这种差异是由于生产下降的牛的肠杆菌科(Enterobacteriaceae)的相对丰度较大(67.8%对 38.4%)解释的。微生物组组成的分析确定了一个门,变形菌门,在生产下降的大肠杆菌阳性牛中存在差异。对乳腺炎后 LS 与微生物组之间的β多样性进行评估,未发现统计学关系。当评估培养阴性象限的微生物组的 α 和 β 多样性和组成时,未发现牛奶产量变化和乳腺炎后 LS 之间存在关联。有 3 头牛没有留在牛群中,限制了对生存的分析。研究结果表明,大肠杆菌阳性牛不良结果的一个促成因素是该病原体的相对丰度,并且没有单个或集体的细菌家族与培养阴性象限的牛奶产量变化或乳腺炎后 LS 相关。尽管应进行更多研究,但本研究中探索的结果与微生物特征之间没有关联表明,我们没有错过不治疗非严重大肠杆菌或培养阴性乳腺炎病例的机会。