Suppr超能文献

氟喹诺酮类药物与复方磺胺甲噁唑治疗嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Fluoroquinolones versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 May;25(5):546-554. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Nov 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fluoroquinolones are a popular alternative to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole on mortality of S. maltophilia infections.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and EMBASE.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Clinical studies reporting mortality outcomes of S. maltophilia infections.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with clinical infections caused by S. maltophilia.

INTERVENTIONS

Fluoroquinolone monotherapy in comparison with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole monotherapy.

METHODS

Systematic review with meta-analysis technique.

RESULTS

Seven retrospective cohort and seven case-control studies were included. Three cohort studies were designed to compare the two drugs, whereas others had other purposes. A total of 663 patients were identified, 332 of which were treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (50.1%) and 331 with fluoroquinolones (49.9%). Three cohort studies were designed to compare the effect of the two drugs, whereas the others had other purposes. Levofloxacin was most frequently used among fluoroquinolones (187/331, 56.5%), followed by ciprofloxacin (114/331, 34.4%). The overall mortality rate was 29.6%. Using pooled ORs for the mortality of each study, fluoroquinolone treatment (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.99) was associated with survival benefit over trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole treatment, with low heterogeneity (I = 18%). Specific fluoroquinolones such as ciprofloxacin (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.17-1.12) and levofloxacin (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.48-1.26) did not show a significant difference in comparison with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. In the sub-group analyses of adult and bacteraemic patients, significant differences in mortality were not observed between fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a meta-analysis of non-randomized studies, fluoroquinolones demonstrated comparable effects on mortality of S. maltophilia infection to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, supporting the use of fluoroquinolones in clinical S. maltophilia infections. Although the pooled analysis of overall studies favoured fluoroquinolones over trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, the studies included were observational, and sub-group analyses of certain fluoroquinolone agents did not show statistical differences with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Randomized clinical studies are needed to address these issues.

摘要

背景

氟喹诺酮类药物是治疗嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染的一种替代复方磺胺甲噁唑的常用药物。

目的

比较氟喹诺酮类药物和复方磺胺甲噁唑对嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染死亡率的影响。

数据来源

PubMed 和 EMBASE。

研究入选标准

报告嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染死亡率结局的临床研究。

研究对象

患有嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌引起的临床感染的患者。

干预措施

氟喹诺酮类药物单药治疗与复方磺胺甲噁唑单药治疗。

研究方法

系统评价与荟萃分析技术。

结果

共纳入 7 项回顾性队列研究和 7 项病例对照研究。其中 3 项队列研究旨在比较这两种药物,而其他研究则有其他目的。共确定了 663 名患者,其中 332 名接受了复方磺胺甲噁唑治疗(50.1%),331 名接受了氟喹诺酮类药物治疗(49.9%)。3 项队列研究旨在比较两种药物的效果,而其他研究则有其他目的。氟喹诺酮类药物中最常使用的是左氧氟沙星(187/331,56.5%),其次是环丙沙星(114/331,34.4%)。总的死亡率为 29.6%。使用每个研究的死亡率的汇总 OR,氟喹诺酮类药物治疗(OR 0.62,95%CI 0.39-0.99)与复方磺胺甲噁唑治疗相比具有生存获益,异质性较低(I=18%)。特定的氟喹诺酮类药物,如环丙沙星(OR 0.44,95%CI 0.17-1.12)和左氧氟沙星(OR 0.78,95%CI 0.48-1.26)与复方磺胺甲噁唑相比,差异无统计学意义。在成人和菌血症患者的亚组分析中,氟喹诺酮类药物和复方磺胺甲噁唑治疗组的死亡率无显著差异。

结论

基于非随机研究的荟萃分析,氟喹诺酮类药物与复方磺胺甲噁唑在治疗嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染的死亡率方面效果相当,支持在临床嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染中使用氟喹诺酮类药物。尽管总体研究的汇总分析支持氟喹诺酮类药物优于复方磺胺甲噁唑,但纳入的研究为观察性研究,某些氟喹诺酮类药物的亚组分析与复方磺胺甲噁唑相比并未显示出统计学差异。需要开展随机临床试验来解决这些问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验