Suppr超能文献

铁剂治疗危重症成人减少红细胞输血需求和治疗贫血的安全性和有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析及试验序贯分析。

Safety and efficacy of iron therapy on reducing red blood cell transfusion requirements and treating anaemia in critically ill adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

机构信息

Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Systematic Review Initiative, NHS Blood & Transplant, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2019 Feb;49:162-171. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety (risk of infection) and efficacy (transfusion requirements, changes in haemoglobin (Hb)) of iron therapy in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically searched seven databases for all relevant studies until January 2018 and included randomized (RCT) studies comparing iron, by any route, with placebo/no iron.

RESULTS

805 participants from 6 RCTs were included. Iron therapy, by any route, did not decrease the risk of requirement for a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion (Risk ratio (RR) 0.91, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.04, p = 0.15) or mean number of RBCs transfused per participant (mean difference (MD) -0.30, 95% CI -0.68 to 0.07, p = 0.15). Iron therapy did increase mean Hb concentration (MD 0.31 g/dL, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.59, p = 0.03). There was no difference in infection (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.19, p = 0.44). Trial Sequential Analysis suggests that the required participant numbers to detect or reject a clinically important effect of iron therapy on transfusion requirements or infection in ICU patients has not yet been reached.

CONCLUSION

Iron therapy results in a modest increase in Hb. The current evidence is inadequate to exclude an important effect on transfusion requirements or infection.

摘要

目的

评估成人重症监护病房(ICU)患者铁治疗的安全性(感染风险)和疗效(输血需求、血红蛋白(Hb)变化)。

材料和方法

我们系统地检索了 7 个数据库,以获取截至 2018 年 1 月的所有相关研究,并纳入了比较任何途径给予铁剂与安慰剂/无铁剂的随机对照试验(RCT)研究。

结果

纳入了 6 项 RCT 的 805 名参与者。任何途径的铁治疗均不能降低输血需求的风险(风险比(RR)0.91,95%置信区间(CI)0.80 至 1.04,p=0.15)或每位参与者输注的平均红细胞(RBC)数量(平均差(MD)-0.30,95% CI -0.68 至 0.07,p=0.15)。铁治疗确实增加了平均 Hb 浓度(MD 0.31 g/dL,95% CI 0.04 至 0.59,p=0.03)。感染率无差异(RR 0.95,95% CI 0.79 至 1.19,p=0.44)。试验序贯分析表明,尚未达到检测或拒绝 ICU 患者铁治疗对输血需求或感染有临床重要影响所需的参与者数量。

结论

铁治疗可使 Hb 适度增加。目前的证据尚不足以排除其对输血需求或感染有重要影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验