Safronova Elizaveta I, Dydykin Sergey S, Grigorevskiy Evgeny D, Tverye Ekaterina A, Kolchenko Stepan I, Piskunova Natalia N, Denisova Anna V, Titova Galina P, Parshin Vladimir D, Romanova Olga A, Panteleyev Andrey A
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
National Research Center Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Laryngoscope. 2019 Jun;129(6):E213-E219. doi: 10.1002/lary.27480. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To develop an experimental model in rabbits for assessment of tracheal epithelium regeneration through application of either natural or artificial polymer scaffolds.
First, we identified the size of full-thickness mucosal defect, which does not allow self-healing (a "critical defect"), thus representing an adequate experimental model for regenerative therapy of tracheal epithelium damage. Then, two methods of polymer scaffold fixation at the site of the epithelium defect were compared: suturing and fixation with a stent. This was done through: 1) formation of a full-thickness anterolateral mucosal defect by tracheal mucosa excision; and 2) fixation of the scaffold at the site of the tracheal epithelium defect using sutures (through a tracheal wall "window") or a vascular stent (through a small tracheal incision).
The dimension of a critical anterolateral mucosal defect of the trachea for rabbits was found to be 1.5 cm in length and more than 50% of the tracheal circumference. Fixation of the scaffold with a stent proved to be more efficient due to a uniform distribution of the pressure over the entire surface of the scaffold, whereas the suturing of the scaffold provided unsatisfactory results. In addition, fixation of the scaffold by suturing required formation of a large "window" in the tracheal wall. Thus, using the stent appeared to be technically less complicated and much less traumatic as compared to suturing.
We present an experimental in vivo animal model of tracheal epithelium injury and recovery. It can be effectively used with certain further modifications as a basis for routine testing of bioengineered constructs.
NA Laryngoscope, 129:E213-E219, 2019.
目的/假设:通过应用天然或人工聚合物支架,开发一种用于评估兔气管上皮再生的实验模型。
首先,我们确定了全层黏膜缺损的大小,这种缺损无法自愈(“临界缺损”),因此代表了一种适用于气管上皮损伤再生治疗的实验模型。然后,比较了两种在黏膜缺损部位固定聚合物支架的方法:缝合和用支架固定。具体操作如下:1)通过切除气管黏膜形成全层前外侧黏膜缺损;2)使用缝线(通过气管壁“窗口”)或血管支架(通过气管小切口)将支架固定在气管上皮缺损部位。
发现兔气管临界前外侧黏膜缺损的尺寸为长度1.5厘米且超过气管周长的50%。事实证明,用支架固定支架更有效,因为压力能均匀分布在支架的整个表面,而缝合支架的效果不理想。此外,通过缝合固定支架需要在气管壁上形成一个大“窗口”。因此,与缝合相比,使用支架在技术上似乎更简单,创伤也小得多。
我们提出了一种气管上皮损伤和恢复的体内实验动物模型。经过一定的进一步改进后,它可有效地用作生物工程构建体常规测试的基础。
NA《喉镜》,2019年,第129卷,E213 - E219页