IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2019 Jan;66(1):57-70. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2881726. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
Synthetic aperture focusing techniques (SAFT) make the spatial resolution of the conventional ultrasound imaging from a single-element focused transducer more uniform in the lateral direction. In this work, two new frequency-domain (FD-SAFT) algorithms are proposed, which are based on the synthetic aperture radar's wavenumber algorithm, and 2-D matched filtering technique for the image reconstruction. The first algorithm is the FD-SAFT virtual source (FD-SAFT-VS) that treats the focus of a focused transducer as a virtual source having a finite size and the diffraction effect in the far-field is taken into consideration in the image reconstruction. The second algorithm is the FD-SAFT deconvolution (FD-SAFT-DE) that uses the simulated point spread function of the imaging system as a matched filter kernel in the image reconstruction. The performance of the proposed algorithms was studied using a series of simulations and experiments, and it was compared with the conventional B-mode and time-domain SAFT (TD-SAFT) imaging techniques. The image quality was analyzed in terms of spatial resolution, sidelobe level, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast resolution, contrast-to-speckle ratio, and ex vivo image quality. The results showed that the FD-SAFT-VS had the smallest spatial resolution and FD-SAFT-DE had the second smallest spatial resolution. In addition, FD-SAFT-DE had generally the largest SNR. The computation run time of FD-SAFT-VS and FD-SAFT-DE, depending on the image size, was lower by 4 to 174 times and 4 to 189 times, respectively, compared to the TD-SAFT-virtual point source.
合成孔径聚焦技术 (SAFT) 可使传统超声成像中单个聚焦换能器的横向空间分辨率更加均匀。在这项工作中,提出了两种新的频域 (FD-SAFT) 算法,它们基于合成孔径雷达的波数算法和用于图像重建的 2D 匹配滤波技术。第一种算法是 FD-SAFT 虚拟源 (FD-SAFT-VS),它将聚焦换能器的焦点视为具有有限大小的虚拟源,并在图像重建中考虑远场的衍射效应。第二种算法是 FD-SAFT 反卷积 (FD-SAFT-DE),它在图像重建中使用成像系统的模拟点扩散函数作为匹配滤波器核。使用一系列模拟和实验研究了所提出算法的性能,并将其与传统 B 模式和时域 SAFT (TD-SAFT) 成像技术进行了比较。从空间分辨率、旁瓣电平、信噪比 (SNR)、对比分辨率、对比噪声比和离体图像质量等方面分析了图像质量。结果表明,FD-SAFT-VS 具有最小的空间分辨率,FD-SAFT-DE 具有第二小的空间分辨率。此外,FD-SAFT-DE 通常具有最大的 SNR。FD-SAFT-VS 和 FD-SAFT-DE 的计算运行时间取决于图像大小,与 TD-SAFT 虚拟点源相比,分别降低了 4 到 174 倍和 4 到 189 倍。