Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Mar 18;21(4):547-557. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy191.
The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes in children with relapsed, molecularly characterized intracranial ependymoma treated with or without craniospinal irradiation (CSI) as part of a course of repeat radiation therapy (re-RT).
This was a retrospective cohort study of 31 children. Patients with distant relapse received CSI as part of re-RT. For patients with locally recurrent ependymoma, those treated before 2012 were re-irradiated with focal re-RT. In 2012, institutional practice changed to offer CSI, followed by boost re-RT to the site of resected or gross disease.
Median follow-up was 5.5 years. Of 9 patients with distant relapse after initial RT, 2-year freedom from progression (FFP) and overall survival (OS) were 12.5% and 62.5%, respectively. There were 22 patients with local failure after initial RT. In these patients, use of CSI during re-RT was associated with improvement in 5-year FFP (83.3% with CSI vs 15.2% with focal re-RT only, P = 0.030). In the subgroup of patients with infratentorial primary disease, CSI during re-RT also improved 5-year FFP (100% with CSI, 10.0% with focal re-RT only, P = 0.036). Twenty-three patients had known molecular status; all had posterior fossa group A tumors (n = 17) or tumors with a RELA (v-rel avian reticuloendotheliosis viral oncogene homolog A) fusion (n = 6). No patient developed radiation necrosis after fractionated re-RT, though almost all survivors required assistance throughout formal schooling. Five out of 10 long-term survivors have not developed neuroendocrine deficits.
Re-irradiation with CSI is a safe and effective treatment for children with locally recurrent ependymoma and improves disease control compared with focal re-irradiation, with the benefit most apparent for those with infratentorial primary tumors.
本研究旨在评估接受或不接受颅脊髓照射(CSI)作为重复放疗(re-RT)一部分的复发性、分子特征明确的颅内室管膜瘤患儿的治疗结果。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,共纳入 31 例患儿。远处复发的患儿接受 CSI 作为 re-RT 的一部分。对于局部复发的室管膜瘤患儿,2012 年以前接受局部再放疗。2012 年,机构治疗方案改变,提供 CSI,然后对切除或大体疾病部位进行局部加量放疗。
中位随访时间为 5.5 年。9 例初始放疗后发生远处复发的患儿,2 年无进展生存率(FFP)和总生存率(OS)分别为 12.5%和 62.5%。22 例患儿初始放疗后局部复发。在这些患儿中,re-RT 期间使用 CSI 可改善 5 年 FFP(有 CSI 组为 83.3%,仅局部再放疗组为 15.2%,P=0.030)。在幕下原发疾病的亚组中,re-RT 期间使用 CSI 也可改善 5 年 FFP(有 CSI 组为 100%,仅局部再放疗组为 10.0%,P=0.036)。23 例患儿的分子状态已知;均为后颅窝 A 组肿瘤(n=17)或存在 RELA(v-rel 禽网状内皮增生病毒癌基因同源物 A)融合的肿瘤(n=6)。虽然所有幸存者在正规学校教育期间都需要帮助,但没有患儿在接受分次 re-RT 后发生放射性坏死。10 例长期幸存者中有 5 例未出现神经内分泌缺陷。
CSI 再次放疗是治疗局部复发性室管膜瘤患儿的一种安全有效的方法,与局部再放疗相比,可改善疾病控制,对于幕下原发肿瘤患儿获益更明显。