Fraunhofer-Chalmers Centre, Chalmers Science Park, Göteborg, Sweden.
Fraunhofer-Chalmers Centre, Chalmers Science Park, Göteborg, Sweden.
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2019 Feb 1;128:250-269. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2018.11.015. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
This study presents an extensive dose-response-time (DRT) meta-analysis of the nicotinic acid-induced inhibition of free fatty acids and insulin release. The purpose was to quantify the implications of lacking exposure data when analysing complex pharmacodynamic systems. The DRT model successfully characterised various response behaviours-including time-delays, rebound, feedback mechanisms, and adaptation-on both the individual and the population level. Comparing the fitted DRT model to an exposure-driven reference analysis showed that bias and uncertainty were introduced in the parameter estimates. However, most estimates were within one standard error from the reference. In both approaches, a few parameters suffered from practical identifiability issues, likely due to large differences in half-lives of the different rate processes. Moreover, the optimal dosing strategies predicted by the DRT model differed slightly from those of the exposure-driven analysis, having a lower optimal steady-state reduction of free fatty acids exposure.
本研究对烟酸抑制游离脂肪酸和胰岛素释放的量效时间(DRT)进行了广泛的荟萃分析。目的是量化在分析复杂药效动力学系统时缺乏暴露数据的影响。DRT 模型成功地描述了个体和群体水平上的各种反应行为,包括时滞、反弹、反馈机制和适应。将拟合的 DRT 模型与基于暴露的参考分析进行比较表明,参数估计中存在偏差和不确定性。然而,大多数估计值与参考值相差一个标准误差以内。在这两种方法中,有几个参数都存在实际可识别性问题,可能是由于不同速率过程的半衰期差异较大所致。此外,DRT 模型预测的最佳给药策略与基于暴露的分析略有不同,最佳稳态游离脂肪酸暴露降低。