• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创妇科手术相关输尿管损伤的诉讼:法律文献回顾得到的教训。

Litigations Involving Ureteral Injury Related to Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: Lessons Learned from a Legal Literature Review.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (all authors)..

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (all authors).

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 May-Jun;26(4):608-617. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2018.11.003
PMID:30453075
Abstract

Ureteral injury is a known complication of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Despite being discussed preoperatively and included in consent forms, litigations that involve such injury continue to be prevalent. Our aim was to review all major litigations involving ureteral injuries related to minimally invasive gynecologic surgery to determine the most common allegations from plaintiffs and highlight factors that aided defendants. We used Lexis Nexis, a comprehensive legal database, to search all publicly available federal- and state-level cases on ureteral injury related to gynecologic surgeries. Fifty-nine cases resulted from our search. Of these cases, 19 were deemed pertinent to our question. These 19 cases occurred between 1993 and 2018. The most common allegations included medical negligence, lack of informed consent, and medical battery. Eight of 19 cases (42%) were decided in favor of the defendants, 3 of 19 cases (16%) in favor of the plaintiffs, and the remaining cases proceeded to further trial or are ongoing. The monetary compensation to a plaintiff was as high as $426,079.50. Meticulous documentation, comprehensive consent procedure, timely postoperative evaluation, and the use of immediate postoperative cystoscopy were the critical factors that aided the defendants. Meticulous documentation, a comprehensive consent procedure, timely postoperative evaluation, and the use of immediate postoperative cystoscopy can aid minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons involved in litigations involving ureteral injury.

摘要

输尿管损伤是微创妇科手术的已知并发症。尽管在术前讨论并包含在同意书中,但涉及此类损伤的诉讼仍层出不穷。我们的目的是审查所有与微创妇科手术相关的输尿管损伤的主要诉讼,以确定原告最常见的指控,并强调有助于被告的因素。我们使用 Lexis Nexis 这一全面的法律数据库,对与妇科手术相关的输尿管损伤的所有公开联邦和州级案件进行了搜索。我们的搜索结果为 59 起案件。其中 19 起案件与我们的问题相关。这些案件发生在 1993 年至 2018 年期间。最常见的指控包括医疗疏忽、缺乏知情同意和医疗侵权。19 起案件中有 8 起(42%)有利于被告,19 起案件中有 3 起(16%)有利于原告,其余案件继续进行进一步的审判或正在进行中。向原告支付的赔偿金高达 426,079.50 美元。细致的记录、全面的同意程序、及时的术后评估以及立即进行术后膀胱镜检查是有助于被告的关键因素。细致的记录、全面的同意程序、及时的术后评估以及立即进行术后膀胱镜检查可以帮助微创妇科外科医生处理涉及输尿管损伤的诉讼。

相似文献

1
Litigations Involving Ureteral Injury Related to Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: Lessons Learned from a Legal Literature Review.微创妇科手术相关输尿管损伤的诉讼:法律文献回顾得到的教训。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 May-Jun;26(4):608-617. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
2
Understanding the Legal Essentials of a Bowel Injury Lawsuit in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.理解微创妇科手术中肠损伤诉讼的法律要点。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jan;25(1):30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
3
Review of Malpractice Litigations Involving Vesicovaginal and Rectovaginal Fistulas Following Elective Hysterectomy for Benign Indications in the United States From 1970 to 2020.美国 1970 年至 2020 年择期良性子宫切除术相关的医源性膀胱阴道瘘和直肠阴道瘘医疗事故诉讼回顾。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Mar 1;27(3):186-194. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001012.
4
Analysis of Factors Associated With Rhytidectomy Malpractice Litigation Cases.除皱术医疗事故诉讼案件相关因素分析
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Jul 1;19(4):255-259. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1782.
5
Lessons Learned From a Review of Malpractice Litigations Involving Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury in the United States.美国产科肛门括约肌损伤医疗事故诉讼综述的经验教训
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Apr;26(4):249-258. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000687.
6
Malpractice litigation surrounding in vitro fertilization in the United States: a legal literature review.美国围绕体外受精的医疗事故诉讼:一项法律文献综述
Fertil Steril. 2023 Apr;119(4):572-580. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.12.038. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
7
Malpractice litigation in the endovascular era.血管内治疗时代的医疗事故诉讼
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jul;68(1):219-224. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.081. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
8
Salivary gland surgery and medical malpractice.唾液腺手术与医疗事故。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Apr;148(4):589-94. doi: 10.1177/0194599813475566. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
9
Accuracy of cystoscopy in the diagnosis of ureteral injury in benign gynecologic surgery.膀胱镜检查在良性妇科手术中诊断输尿管损伤的准确性。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003 Dec;14(6):427-31. doi: 10.1007/s00192-003-1095-7. Epub 2003 Nov 18.
10
The medicolegal landscape of spine surgery: how do surgeons fare?脊柱外科的医法领域:外科医生表现如何?
Spine J. 2018 Feb;18(2):209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.038. Epub 2017 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategies for Cost Optimization in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.微创妇科手术中的成本优化策略。
JSLS. 2022 Jul-Sep;26(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00015.