Suppr超能文献

迈向伦巴第大区(意大利)沥青废弃物资源高效管理:基于生命周期评价方法的有效策略识别。

Towards resource-efficient management of asphalt waste in Lombardy region (Italy): Identification of effective strategies based on the LCA methodology.

机构信息

Politecnico di Milano, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy; MatER Resource Centre, via Nino Bixio 27/c, 29121 Piacenza, Italy.

Politecnico di Milano, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2018 Oct;80:423-434. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.035. Epub 2018 Oct 3.

Abstract

This study presents a comparison of alternative strategies for managing asphalt waste currently implemented in Lombardy Region (Italy). The waste under study is the one arising from deconstruction and milling of old pavements not containing tar, and, hereafter, it is referred as reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP). The life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was applied to the regional system to evaluate its current performance, to identify critical aspects and to suggest actions for improving it. As first step, the amount of RAP generated and recycled within the region was computed by elaborating raw waste data annually collected by the regional agency for the environmental protection. Roughly 1 million tonne of RAP was managed in Lombardy in 2014; most of it was recovered/recycled and only 1% was directly landfilled. Data revealed that RAP was mainly recovered as unbound aggregate for road bases and sub-bases or fillings (52.5%) whereas RAP addition into new asphalt mixtures was less widespread (39.4%). In this case, RAP was mostly recycled in stationary hot mix asphalt (HMAs) and cold mix asphalt (CMAs) plants. Hence, the present LCA focused on these two types of techniques. Primary data on both processes were directly collected from some investigated facilities to set out the current scenario. Sensitivity analyses were then performed to find out the key parameters and their influence on the LCA outcome. Results indicate that recycling RAP in hot/cold mixes is significantly more beneficial than its recovery as unbound material. Moreover, hot recycling provides better environmental performance than cold processes performed at stationary plants, despite the lower RAP addition (20% in HMAs vs 80% in CMAs); this is mainly due to the use of stabilizing agents in the production of CMAs and to the lower field performance of CMAs compared to virgin HMAs. Based on these results, a best-case scenario has been developed to quantify the benefits arising from the suggested actions.

摘要

本研究比较了意大利伦巴第大区(Lombardy Region)目前实施的几种处理废弃沥青的替代策略。研究中的废弃物是指来自不含焦油的旧路面拆除和铣刨过程中的废弃沥青路面(reclaimed asphalt pavement,RAP)。本研究采用生命周期评估(life cycle assessment,LCA)方法对区域系统进行评估,以评估其当前的表现、确定关键方面并提出改进措施。首先,通过详细分析区域机构每年收集的原始废物数据,计算出该地区产生和回收的 RAP 量。2014 年,伦巴第大区共处理了约 100 万吨 RAP;其中大部分被回收/再循环,只有 1%被直接填埋。数据显示,RAP 主要被回收为道路基层和底基层或填充物的非结合骨料(52.5%),而 RAP 加入新的沥青混合物的情况则较少(39.4%)。在这种情况下,RAP 主要在固定式热拌沥青(hot mix asphalt,HMA)和冷拌沥青(cold mix asphalt,CMA)工厂中进行回收。因此,本研究重点关注这两种技术。从一些调查设施中直接收集了这两种工艺的原始数据,以了解当前的情况。然后进行了敏感性分析,以找出关键参数及其对 LCA 结果的影响。结果表明,在热/冷混合物中回收 RAP 比将其回收为非结合材料更为有利。此外,尽管热回收工艺中 RAP 的添加量较低(HMA 中为 20%,CMA 中为 80%),但其环境性能优于在固定式工厂中进行的冷工艺,这主要是由于在 CMA 生产中使用了稳定剂以及 CMA 的现场性能比 virgin HMA 差。基于这些结果,开发了一个最佳案例场景来量化所建议措施带来的效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验