Suppr超能文献

套索试验更新

LARIAT Trial Updates.

作者信息

Musat Dan, Mittal Suneet

机构信息

Valley Health System of NY and NJ, Paramus, NJ.

出版信息

J Atr Fibrillation. 2018 Jun 30;11(1):1806. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1806. eCollection 2018 Jun-Jul.

Abstract

The thrombus formed within the LAA is responsible for the vast (about 90%) majority of strokes. Anticoagulation, although effective therapy for stroke prevention is not feasible in a significant minority of patients due to various reasons. Two percutaenous LAA exclusion techniques have been developed in an effort to decrease risk for stroke: endocardial closure/plugging of the LAA (Watchman, Amplatzer devices) and epicardial LAA ligation (LARIAT). The aim of this study is to review the trial data to date for the LARIAT device. The LARIAT suture has been used in more than 4500 patients with high success of LAA complete closure (92-100%), mostly in the patients unable to take anticoagulation and in a small minority as antiarrhythmic option. The LARIAT technique has evolved with a change in pericardial access method that resulted in dramatic improvement of safety. LAA closure performance with LARIAT system seems to be similar to Watchman device, with small leaks during follow-up in 6-24% of the cases, which do not to correlate with thrombo-embolic events. LAA has been proven to play an important triggering role in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Small studies had shown that LAA ligation with LARIAT could terminate persistent atrial fibrillation and possible improve ablation success. Ongoing aMAZE randomized trial is studying if LAA ligaiton using LARIAT suture leads to improved atrial fibrillation ablation success. Available data suggests that LAA closure using LARIAT epicardial suture is a good alternative for stroke risk reduction in patients who are unable to be on anticoagulation therapy. LARIAT system might improve success of AF ablation for patients with persistent and long persistent AF, pending the results of the ongoing aMAZE trial.

摘要

左心耳内形成的血栓是绝大多数(约90%)中风的病因。抗凝治疗虽为预防中风的有效疗法,但由于各种原因,在相当一部分患者中并不可行。为降低中风风险,已研发出两种经皮左心耳封堵技术:左心耳的心内膜闭合/封堵(Watchman、Amplatzer装置)和心外膜左心耳结扎(LARIAT)。本研究旨在回顾迄今为止LARIAT装置的试验数据。LARIAT缝线已应用于4500多名患者,左心耳完全闭合成功率很高(92 - 100%),主要用于无法进行抗凝治疗的患者,少数情况下作为抗心律失常的选择。LARIAT技术随着心包穿刺入路方法的改变而不断发展,安全性得到显著提高。LARIAT系统的左心耳闭合效果似乎与Watchman装置相似,随访期间6 - 24%的病例有少量渗漏,但这与血栓栓塞事件无关。已证实左心耳在持续性房颤患者中起重要的触发作用。小型研究表明,使用LARIAT进行左心耳结扎可终止持续性房颤,并可能提高消融成功率。正在进行的aMAZE随机试验正在研究使用LARIAT缝线进行左心耳结扎是否能提高房颤消融成功率。现有数据表明,对于无法接受抗凝治疗的患者,使用LARIAT心外膜缝线闭合左心耳是降低中风风险的良好替代方案。在aMAZE试验结果出来之前,LARIAT系统可能会提高持续性和长期持续性房颤患者的房颤消融成功率。

相似文献

1
LARIAT Trial Updates.
J Atr Fibrillation. 2018 Jun 30;11(1):1806. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1806. eCollection 2018 Jun-Jul.
3
The Left Atrial Appendage: Target for Stroke Reduction in Atrial Fibrillation.
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2015 Apr-Jun;11(2):100-3. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-11-2-100.
4
The role of multimodality imaging in percutaneous left atrial appendage suture ligation with the LARIAT device.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 Jul;27(7):699-708. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 May 27.
8
A review of the LARIAT device: insights from the cumulative clinical experience.
Springerplus. 2015 Sep 17;4:522. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1289-8. eCollection 2015.
9
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Nonrheumatic Atrial Fibrillation.
J Atr Fibrillation. 2013 Oct 31;6(3):923. doi: 10.4022/jafib.923. eCollection 2013 Oct-Nov.
10
Left atrial appendage ligation with the next generation LARIAT(+) suture delivery device: Early clinical experience.
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 15;215:244-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Comprehensive Review.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 25;16(7):e65347. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65347. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
The Left Atrial Appendage and Atrial Fibrillation-A Contemporary Review.
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 2;12(21):6909. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216909.
4
Long-Term Stroke Risk in Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Ablation With and Without Complete Isolation.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Dec 9;8:762839. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.762839. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

2
Left Atrial Appendage Ligation and Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The LAALA-AF Registry.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Jun;1(3):153-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
3
Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Systemic Homeostasis: The LAA HOMEOSTASIS Study.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jan 16;71(2):135-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.092.
4
Potential US Population Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA High Blood Pressure Guideline.
Circulation. 2018 Jan 9;137(2):109-118. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032582. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
5
Anatomical and electrical remodeling with incomplete left atrial appendage ligation: Results from the LAALA-AF registry.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017 Dec;28(12):1433-1442. doi: 10.1111/jce.13343. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
6
Embryology and Anatomy of the Left Atrial Appendage: Why Does Thrombus Form?
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2014 Apr;3(2):191-202. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2013.11.002. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
8
A hospital-based survey of patients with severe valvular heart disease in China.
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 15;231:244-247. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.301. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
9
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: current state of the art.
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017 Jan;32(1):27-38. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000367.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验