Hardcastle Timothy C, Faurie Michael, Muckart David J J
Trauma Service - Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, 800 Vusi Mzimela Rd, Mayville, 4051 Durban, South Africa.
Department of Surgery, UKZN, 800 Vusi Mzimela Rd, Mayville, 4051 Durban, South Africa.
Afr J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;6(1):24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
The consequences of excessive endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff pressure are known and have long-term effects; however less attention is placed upon cuff pressure and tube position pre-hospital and in emergency centre. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ETT cuff pressure and tube position on arrival of all patients admitted to the Trauma Unit at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, both from scene and inter-hospital transfers to determine the median cuff-pressure and if there were differences between the two groups.
Data from Trauma Unit patients are entered into a prospective; UKZN approved (BE207-09) Trauma Database. Data on 65 admissions between April and December 2014 were reviewed to determine the arrival cuff pressure and tube position. Data captured included patient age, cuff pressure, where and who intubated the patient, and time since intubation to cuff pressure check. Data were analysed by descriptive statistics and Student's -test for continuous data.
Most patients had sustained motor vehicle related trauma, with a male predominance. Equal numbers were intubated pre-hospital versus the in-hospital group. Eighty percent of ETT's were placed in the correct anatomical location, however only 23% of cuff pressures were found to be within the safe pressure limits. ETT cuff pressures were excessive in the pre-hospital ALS group more often than the facility-intubation group ( = 0.042). There were fatal complications related to supra-glottic intubations resulting in aspiration pneumonia, highlighting the need for X-ray confirmation of tube position.
Most patients, whether intubated on-scene or at hospital have ETT cuff pressures that are excessive, with the potential for ischaemic necrosis of the tracheal mucosa. ETT cuff manometry should be standard of care for all prehospital and in-hospital intubations where the tube will remain in situ for any prolonged period of time. Before inter-facility transfer ETT position should be confirmed radiologically.
气管内导管(ETT)套囊压力过高的后果是已知的,且具有长期影响;然而,院前和急诊中心对套囊压力和导管位置的关注较少。本研究的目的是评估因科西·阿尔伯特·卢图利中央医院创伤科收治的所有患者(包括现场急救患者和院间转运患者)入院时的ETT套囊压力和导管位置,以确定套囊压力的中位数,并比较两组之间是否存在差异。
创伤科患者的数据被录入一个前瞻性的、经夸祖鲁-纳塔尔大学(UKZN)批准(BE207-09)的创伤数据库。回顾了2014年4月至12月期间65例入院患者的数据,以确定入院时的套囊压力和导管位置。收集的数据包括患者年龄、套囊压力、患者插管的地点和人员,以及从插管到检查套囊压力的时间。对数据进行描述性统计分析,并对连续数据进行学生t检验。
大多数患者遭受了与机动车相关的创伤,男性居多。院前插管组和院内插管组的患者数量相等。80%的ETT放置在正确的解剖位置,但只有23%的套囊压力在安全压力范围内。院前高级生命支持(ALS)组的ETT套囊压力过高的情况比医院内插管组更常见(P = 0.042)。与声门上插管相关的致命并发症导致了吸入性肺炎,这突出了通过X线确认导管位置的必要性。
大多数患者,无论在现场还是在医院插管,其ETT套囊压力都过高,存在气管黏膜缺血坏死的风险。对于所有需要长时间留置导管的院前和院内插管,ETT套囊测压应成为标准护理措施。在机构间转运前,应通过影像学检查确认ETT的位置。