• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析种植体失败的风险因素,尤其是上颌磨牙区:对 6977 例中国人群种植体的回顾性研究。

Analysis of implant loss risk factors especially in maxillary molar location: A retrospective study of 6977 implants in Chinese individuals.

机构信息

Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Feb;21(1):138-144. doi: 10.1111/cid.12697. Epub 2018 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1111/cid.12697
PMID:30456779
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The knowledge of the potential risk factors associated with implant loss is crucial for dental clinicians, but the opinions about the risk factors are still diverse and controversial.

PURPOSE

This retrospective study assessed the risk factors associated with implant loss, especially that in the maxillary molar location.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2015 to March 2017, 4338 Chinese patients received 6977 implants at Nanjing Stomatological Hospital. Information on patient age, gender, bone grafting procedure, implant location, length and diameter, and the records of lost implants were obtained. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to conduct a survival function analysis. Chi-square test and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to identify risk factors related to implant loss.

RESULTS

The cumulative survival rate (CSR) after 0-32 months of observation period for all implants was 97.76%, and the CSR for maxillary molar implants was 97.00%. Maxillary molar implants showed a significantly lower CSR than the other implants (P < .05). Male sex, short implants (<10 mm) were considered as risk factors for implant loss. However, male sex and bone grafting procedure were regarded as risk factors for maxillary molar implant loss, which was slightly different from the result of all implants.

CONCLUSIONS

Male sex, short implants (<10 mm) and maxillary molar location were considered as potential risk factors for implant loss, whereas male sex and bone grafting procedure were significantly associated with implant loss in maxillary molar location.

摘要

背景

了解与种植体失败相关的潜在风险因素对口腔临床医生至关重要,但关于风险因素的意见仍然存在分歧和争议。

目的

本回顾性研究评估了与种植体失败相关的风险因素,尤其是上颌磨牙部位的风险因素。

材料和方法

本研究纳入了 2015 年 1 月至 2017 年 3 月在南京口腔医院接受种植治疗的 4338 名中国患者,共植入 6977 枚种植体。记录患者年龄、性别、植骨手术、种植体部位、长度和直径,以及种植体丢失的记录。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法和对数秩检验进行生存函数分析,采用卡方检验和多因素 Cox 回归分析确定与种植体失败相关的风险因素。

结果

在 0-32 个月的观察期内,所有种植体的累积生存率(CSR)为 97.76%,上颌磨牙种植体的 CSR 为 97.00%。上颌磨牙种植体的 CSR 明显低于其他种植体(P <.05)。男性、短种植体(<10 mm)被认为是种植体失败的危险因素。然而,男性和植骨手术被认为是上颌磨牙种植体失败的危险因素,这与所有种植体的结果略有不同。

结论

男性、短种植体(<10 mm)和上颌磨牙部位被认为是种植体失败的潜在危险因素,而男性和植骨手术与上颌磨牙部位的种植体失败显著相关。

相似文献

1
Analysis of implant loss risk factors especially in maxillary molar location: A retrospective study of 6977 implants in Chinese individuals.分析种植体失败的风险因素,尤其是上颌磨牙区:对 6977 例中国人群种植体的回顾性研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Feb;21(1):138-144. doi: 10.1111/cid.12697. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
2
Retrospective clinical analysis of risk factors associated with failed short implants.短种植体失败相关风险因素的回顾性临床分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Feb;22(1):112-118. doi: 10.1111/cid.12879. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
3
Epidemiology of Implant Mortality Disparity Among Intraoral Positions and Prosthesis Types.口腔内不同位置及修复体类型的种植体死亡率差异的流行病学研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 May/Jun;32(3):525-532. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5044.
4
One-step oral rehabilitation by means of implants' insertion, Le Fort I, grafts, and immediate loading.通过植入种植体、勒福 I 型截骨术、植骨及即刻负重进行一步式口腔修复。
J Craniofac Surg. 2009 Nov;20(6):2205-10. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181bf8487.
5
The influence of mandibular dentition on implant failures in bone-grafted edentulous maxillae.下颌牙列对植骨无牙上颌种植失败的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 Jan-Feb;17(1):69-77.
6
Factors associated with failure of surface-modified implants up to four years of function.四年功能随访中表面处理种植体失败的相关因素。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Jun;14(3):347-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00282.x. Epub 2010 May 11.
7
Retrospective clinical study of 988 dual acid-etched implants placed in grafted and native bone for single-tooth replacement.回顾性临床研究:988 颗双重酸蚀种植体在移植骨和自体骨中用于单牙种植修复。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Sep-Oct;27(5):1243-8.
8
Retrospective cohort study of 4591 Straumann implants in private practice setting, with up to 10-year follow-up. Part 1: multivariate survival analysis.对私人诊所环境中4591颗士卓曼种植体进行回顾性队列研究,随访时间长达10年。第1部分:多变量生存分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Nov;26(11):1345-54. doi: 10.1111/clr.12463. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
9
Immediate versus conventional loading of post-extraction implants in the edentulous jaws.无牙颌拔牙后种植体的即刻负重与传统负重
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Dec;16(6):926-35. doi: 10.1111/cid.12055. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
10
Analysis of implant loss risk factors after simultaneous guided bone regeneration: A retrospective study of 5404 dental implants.分析同期引导骨再生后种植体失败的风险因素:5404 例牙种植体的回顾性研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Jun;24(3):276-286. doi: 10.1111/cid.13087. Epub 2022 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Construction of EGCG/chlorhexidine functionalized coating to reinforce the soft tissue seal at transmucosal region of implants.构建表没食子儿茶素没食子酸酯/氯己定功能化涂层以增强种植体跨黏膜区域的软组织封闭。
Regen Biomater. 2025 May 20;12:rbaf046. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbaf046. eCollection 2025.
2
The Novel iMPACT Tool and Quadrant Protocol for Peri-Implantitis: Surface Refinement and Re-Osseointegration Validated by SEM/EDS and Long-Term Clinical Case Reports.用于种植体周围炎的新型iMPACT工具和象限方案:通过扫描电子显微镜/能谱仪(SEM/EDS)和长期临床病例报告验证的表面细化和再骨结合
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 16;61(6):1094. doi: 10.3390/medicina61061094.
3
Impact of dental operative microscopes on precision in minimally invasive dental restoration procedures.
牙科手术显微镜对微创牙科修复手术精度的影响。
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Aug 15;16(8):3907-3914. doi: 10.62347/DWNQ1400. eCollection 2024.
4
Satisfaction analysis of patients with single implant treatments based on a questionnaire survey.基于问卷调查的单颗种植治疗患者满意度分析
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 May 7;13:695-704. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S201088. eCollection 2019.