• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于模型的 24 种抗 2 型糖尿病药物的荟萃分析:治疗剂量下的治疗效果比较。

A Model-Based Meta-Analysis of 24 Antihyperglycemic Drugs for Type 2 Diabetes: Comparison of Treatment Effects at Therapeutic Doses.

机构信息

Equation AB, Halmstad, Sweden.

Dallas Diabetes Research Center at Medical City, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 May;105(5):1213-1223. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1307. Epub 2019 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1002/cpt.1307
PMID:30457671
Abstract

Model-based meta-analysis was used to compare glycemic control, weight changes, and hypoglycemia risk across 24 antihyperglycemic drugs used to treat type 2 diabetes. Electronic searches identified 229 randomized controlled studies comprising 121,914 patients. To ensure fair and unbiased treatment comparisons, the analyses adjusted for important differences between studies, including duration of treatment, baseline glycated hemoglobin, and drug dosages. At the approved doses, glycemic control was typically greatest with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), and least with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. Weight loss was highly variable across GLP-1RAs but was similar across sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. Large weight increases were observed with sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones. Hypoglycemia risk was highest with sulfonylureas, although gliclazide was notably lower. Hypoglycemia risk for DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, and thiazolidinediones was generally very low but increased slightly for both GLP-1RAs and metformin. In summary, important differences between and within drug classes were identified.

摘要

采用基于模型的荟萃分析比较了 24 种用于治疗 2 型糖尿病的抗高血糖药物的血糖控制、体重变化和低血糖风险。电子检索确定了包含 121914 名患者的 229 项随机对照研究。为确保公平和无偏见的治疗比较,分析调整了研究之间的重要差异,包括治疗持续时间、基线糖化血红蛋白和药物剂量。在批准的剂量下,GLP-1 受体激动剂 (GLP-1RAs) 的血糖控制通常最佳,二肽基肽酶-4 (DPP-4) 抑制剂的控制效果最差。GLP-1RAs 之间的体重减轻差异很大,但钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 (SGLT2) 抑制剂之间的体重减轻差异相似。磺酰脲类药物和噻唑烷二酮类药物会导致体重显著增加。磺酰脲类药物的低血糖风险最高,尽管格列齐特明显较低。尽管 DPP-4 抑制剂、SGLT2 抑制剂和噻唑烷二酮类药物的低血糖风险通常非常低,但 GLP-1RAs 和二甲双胍的低血糖风险略有增加。总之,确定了药物类别之间和内部的重要差异。

相似文献

1
A Model-Based Meta-Analysis of 24 Antihyperglycemic Drugs for Type 2 Diabetes: Comparison of Treatment Effects at Therapeutic Doses.基于模型的 24 种抗 2 型糖尿病药物的荟萃分析:治疗剂量下的治疗效果比较。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 May;105(5):1213-1223. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1307. Epub 2019 Jan 13.
2
Comparison of glucose-lowering agents after dual therapy failure in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.二甲双胍单药治疗失效的 2 型糖尿病患者换用不同降糖药物的疗效比较:一项系统评价和网状 Meta 分析的随机对照临床试验研究
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Apr;20(4):985-997. doi: 10.1111/dom.13185. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
3
Complementing insulin therapy to achieve glycemic control.补充胰岛素治疗以实现血糖控制。
Adv Ther. 2013 Jun;30(6):557-76. doi: 10.1007/s12325-013-0039-y.
4
Network meta-analysis of treatments for type 2 diabetes mellitus following failure with metformin plus sulfonylurea.二甲双胍加磺脲类药物治疗失败后2型糖尿病治疗的网状Meta分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 May;32(5):807-16. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1135110. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
5
Cardiovascular efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂的心血管疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Diabet Med. 2019 Apr;36(4):444-452. doi: 10.1111/dme.13898. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
6
Cardiovascular effects of antidiabetic drugs.抗糖尿病药物的心血管效应。
Drugs Today (Barc). 2018 Sep;54(9):547-559. doi: 10.1358/dot.2018.54.9.2872500.
7
Treatment Strategy for Type 2 Diabetes with Obesity: Focus on Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists.肥胖型2型糖尿病的治疗策略:聚焦胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂
Clin Ther. 2017 Jun;39(6):1244-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.03.013. Epub 2017 May 16.
8
Glycaemic efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors as add-on therapy to metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes-a review and meta analysis.GLP-1 受体激动剂和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂作为二甲双胍的附加疗法在 2 型糖尿病患者中的血糖疗效:综述和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 Aug;14(8):762-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01603.x. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
9
Efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors: meta-analysis and systematic review.GLP-1 受体激动剂和 DPP-4 抑制剂的疗效:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Clin Ther. 2012 Jun;34(6):1247-1258.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.04.013. Epub 2012 May 18.
10
Fracture risk associated with common medications used in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus.与用于治疗2型糖尿病的常用药物相关的骨折风险。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017 Aug 1;74(15):1143-1151. doi: 10.2146/ajhp160319.

引用本文的文献

1
2025 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Management in Korea: Recommendation of the Korean Diabetes Association.《2025年韩国糖尿病管理临床实践指南:韩国糖尿病协会的建议》
Diabetes Metab J. 2025 Jul;49(4):582-783. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2025.0469. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
2
Twenty-four weeks of combined training in different environments, aquatic and land, in the type 2 diabetes management (Aquatic and Land Exercise for Diabetes -ALED): protocol of a randomized clinical trial.2型糖尿病管理中的24周不同环境(水上和陆地)联合训练(糖尿病的水上和陆地运动-ALED):一项随机临床试验方案
Trials. 2025 Jan 8;26(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08660-2.
3
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.
9. 血糖治疗的药理学方法:2025年糖尿病护理标准
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan 1;48(Supplement_1):S181-S206. doi: 10.2337/dc25-S009.
4
Establishing a Relationship between In Vitro Potency in Cell-Based Assays and Clinical Efficacious Concentrations for Approved GLP-1 Receptor Agonists.建立基于细胞分析的体外效力与已批准的GLP-1受体激动剂临床有效浓度之间的关系。
Pharmaceutics. 2024 Oct 8;16(10):1310. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16101310.
5
Model-based meta-analysis of HbA1c reduction across SGLT2 inhibitors using dose adjusted by urinary glucose excretion.基于模型的 SGLT2 抑制剂糖化血红蛋白降低的荟萃分析,采用尿糖排泄校正的剂量。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 21;14(1):24695. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76256-6.
6
Glycaemic control is still central in the hierarchy of priorities in type 2 diabetes management.血糖控制在2型糖尿病管理的优先事项中仍然处于核心地位。
Diabetologia. 2025 Jan;68(1):17-28. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06254-w. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
7
2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Management in Korea: Full Version Recommendation of the Korean Diabetes Association.《2023年韩国糖尿病管理临床实践指南:韩国糖尿病协会完整版推荐》
Diabetes Metab J. 2024 Jul;48(4):546-708. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2024.0249. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
8
A1C: Episode 3.糖化血红蛋白:第3集。
Clin Diabetes. 2024 Summer;42(3):448-451. doi: 10.2337/cd24-0038. Epub 2024 May 2.
9
Current Position of Gliclazide and Sulfonylureas in the Contemporary Treatment Paradigm for Type 2 Diabetes: A Scoping Review.格列齐特和磺脲类药物在2型糖尿病当代治疗模式中的现状:一项范围综述
Diabetes Ther. 2024 Aug;15(8):1687-1716. doi: 10.1007/s13300-024-01612-8. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
10
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.9. 血糖治疗的药物学方法:2024 年糖尿病护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(Suppl 1):S158-S178. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S009.