Suppr超能文献

质疑共病 CTD+ADHD 中添加剂模型的长期稳定性——从儿童期到成年期的转变。

Questioning the long-term stability of the additive model in comorbid CTD+ADHD - The transition from childhood to adulthood.

机构信息

Clinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.

Service for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Thurgau, Romanshorn, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Nov 20;13(11):e0207522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207522. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A previous study (Roessner et al. 2007) found psychopathological evidence of an additive model of the comorbid group with Chronic Tic Disorders and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (CTD+ADHD), which demanded clinical interventions aimed primarily at the factor ADHD. This 14-year follow-up study tested whether this childhood additive model can also be found in young adulthood and whether ADHD remains the most impairing factor.

METHODS

92 patients (22.8% girls) from Roessner et al. (2007) were re-investigated as young adults at the age of 24 years, broken down into four groups: CTD-only (n = 22), CTD+ADHD (n = 23), ADHD-only (n = 24), and controls (n = 23). The Adult Behavior Checklist (ABCL) was used as an equivalent parent-report instrument to the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) applied 14 years ago. Statistically, 2x2 factorial design was completed.

RESULTS

From the point of view of parents, the factors CTD and ADHD in young adults contributed almost equally to psychopathological problems and showed many interactions, i.e. an interactive model was supported. In addition, the ADHD factor was no longer the leading problem for psychosocial impairment in the adult CTD+ADHD group.

CONCLUSION

The additive model of CTD+ADHD seems to exist no longer in young adults, nor may the childhood predominance of the factor ADHD in comorbid CTD+ADHD. Thus, treatment priority should be decided by clinicians on a case-by-case basis depending on the most impairing disorder of each patient.

摘要

背景

先前的一项研究(Roessner 等人,2007 年)发现了慢性抽动障碍和注意缺陷多动障碍(CTD+ADHD)共病组的精神病理学证据,表明存在叠加模型,这需要针对 ADHD 这一主要因素进行临床干预。本项为期 14 年的随访研究检验了这一儿童期叠加模型是否也能在青年期找到,以及 ADHD 是否仍然是最具损害性的因素。

方法

Roessner 等人(2007 年)的研究中的 92 名患者(22.8%为女孩)在 24 岁时作为青年期被重新评估,分为四组:CTD 组(n=22)、CTD+ADHD 组(n=23)、ADHD 组(n=24)和对照组(n=23)。采用成人行为检查表(ABCL)作为与 14 年前应用的儿童行为检查表(CBCL)等效的家长报告工具。采用 2x2 析因设计进行统计分析。

结果

从家长的角度来看,青少年期的 CTD 和 ADHD 这两个因素几乎同样导致精神病理学问题,且存在许多相互作用,即支持交互模型。此外,ADHD 因素不再是成年 CTD+ADHD 组社会心理损害的主要问题。

结论

CTD+ADHD 的叠加模型似乎在青年期不复存在,也可能不再存在儿童期 ADHD 因素在 CTD+ADHD 中的优势。因此,应根据每位患者最具损害性的疾病,由临床医生逐个病例决定治疗的优先顺序。

相似文献

7
Chronic tic disorders in children with ADHD.儿童注意缺陷多动障碍伴慢性抽动障碍。
Arch Dis Child. 2018 Sep;103(9):847-852. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314139. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
10
Behavior therapy in tic-disorders with co-existing ADHD.共患注意力缺陷多动障碍的抽动障碍的行为疗法
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;16 Suppl 1:89-99. doi: 10.1007/s00787-007-1011-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Course of Tourette Syndrome and Comorbidities in a Large Prospective Clinical Study.一项大型前瞻性临床研究中妥瑞氏症及合并症的病程。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;56(4):304-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
2
Gilles de la Tourette syndrome.图雷特综合征。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Feb 2;3:16097. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.97.
3
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.注意缺陷多动障碍。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015 Aug 6;1:15020. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.20.
9
Comorbidity: the case of developmental psychopathology.共病:发展心理病理学案例。
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):167-8. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000683.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验