• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机对照试验的研究结果在主要的普通医学期刊中的推广性有限。

Generalizability of findings from randomized controlled trials is limited in the leading general medical journals.

机构信息

Chief Physician, Centre for Health and Social Economics, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, 00270 Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;107:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.014
PMID:30458264
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To document reporting of study characteristics of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the four leading general medical journals and to appraise the generalizability of the evidence.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

All RCTs in BMJ, JAMA, Lancet, and NEJM from January 1, 2017 to September 30, 2017 were searched by hand, and data were extracted according to the benchmarking method.

RESULTS

Hundred sixty-one RCTs were found; 67% assessed pharmacological therapy. The percentages of adequate documentation were patients' path before randomization 3% to 33% of trials; characteristics of the health care settings 0% to 75%; at least two comorbid conditions 25% to 50%; at least one measure was reported of functioning 42% to 54%, of behavioral factors 25% to 58%, of environmental factors 3% to 25%, and of inequity-related factors 28% to 68%; cointerventions 6% to 25%; and reasons for dropping out of follow-up 39% to 100%.

CONCLUSION

Almost all RCTs showed deficiencies in description of patient selection and study setting and in reporting of patient characteristics related to functioning, comorbidities, and to behavioral, environmental, and inequity factors. The findings indicate that generalizability of this evidence may be limited. The benchmarking method can be used for planning and appraisal of clinical trials and systematic reviews.

摘要

目的

记录四大普通医学期刊中随机对照试验(RCT)的研究特征报告情况,并评价证据的普遍性。

研究设计和设置

通过手工检索,从 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 9 月 30 日,在《英国医学杂志》、《美国医学会杂志》、《柳叶刀》和《新英格兰医学杂志》中查找所有 RCT,并按照基准方法提取数据。

结果

共发现 161 项 RCT,其中 67%评估了药物治疗。充分记录的比例为患者随机分组前的路径为 3%至 33%的试验;医疗保健环境特征为 0%至 75%;至少有两种合并症为 25%至 50%;至少有一项功能、行为因素、环境因素和与不公平相关因素的测量结果报告,报告比例为 42%至 54%、25%至 58%、3%至 25%和 28%至 68%;联合干预为 6%至 25%;以及失访原因报告为 39%至 100%。

结论

几乎所有 RCT 在描述患者选择和研究环境以及报告与功能、合并症以及行为、环境和不公平因素相关的患者特征方面都存在不足。研究结果表明,该证据的普遍性可能有限。基准方法可用于临床试验和系统评价的规划和评估。

相似文献

1
Generalizability of findings from randomized controlled trials is limited in the leading general medical journals.随机对照试验的研究结果在主要的普通医学期刊中的推广性有限。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;107:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
2
Generalizability of findings from systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the Leading General Medical Journals.主要综合医学期刊中系统评价和荟萃分析结果的可推广性。
J Rehabil Med. 2020 Mar 18;52(3):jrm00031. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2659.
3
The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.试验摘要的报告质量欠佳:对主要综合医学期刊的调查。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;62(4):387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
4
[Features of acupuncture randomised controlled trials published in the top four journals].发表于四大期刊的针灸随机对照试验的特征
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2010 Aug;30(8):679-82.
5
Reporting on data monitoring committees in neonatal randomised controlled trials is inconsistent.关于新生儿随机对照试验中数据监测委员会的报告并不一致。
Acta Paediatr. 2017 Jan;106(1):30-33. doi: 10.1111/apa.13593. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
6
Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: a systematic sampling review.发表于高影响力综合医学期刊的随机对照试验的纳入标准:一项系统抽样综述
JAMA. 2007 Mar 21;297(11):1233-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.11.1233.
7
Avoidable waste related to inadequate methods and incomplete reporting of interventions: a systematic review of randomized trials performed in Sub-Saharan Africa.与干预措施方法不当和报告不完整相关的可避免浪费:对撒哈拉以南非洲进行的随机试验的系统评价
Trials. 2017 Jul 5;18(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2034-0.
8
Information on adverse events in randomised clinical trials assessing drug interventions published in four medical journals with high impact factors.发表于四种高影响因子医学期刊的评估药物干预的随机临床试验中的不良事件信息。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2014;26(1):9-22. doi: 10.3233/JRS-140609.
9
Ideal vs. real: a systematic review on handling covariates in randomized controlled trials.理想与现实:关于随机对照试验中协变量处理的系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jul 3;19(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0787-8.
10
Availability of study protocols for randomized trials published in high-impact medical journals: A cross-sectional analysis.高影响力医学期刊发表的随机试验研究方案的可获得性:一项横断面分析。
Clin Trials. 2020 Feb;17(1):99-105. doi: 10.1177/1740774519868310. Epub 2019 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
New insights in the immune treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome.格林-巴利综合征免疫治疗的新见解。
Curr Opin Neurol. 2025 Oct 1;38(5):471-477. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001408. Epub 2025 Jul 21.
2
Addressing challenges and barriers to rural Veteran participation in clinical research within the Veterans Affairs healthcare system.应对退伍军人事务医疗系统中农村退伍军人参与临床研究的挑战和障碍。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Apr 1;45:101466. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101466. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Quantifying Public Engagement With Science and Malinformation on COVID-19 Vaccines: Cross-Sectional Study.
量化公众对科学及新冠疫苗错误信息的参与度:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 21;27:e64679. doi: 10.2196/64679.
4
Effectiveness and adverse effects of immersive technologies used for rehabilitation of patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review.用于非特异性颈部疼痛患者康复的沉浸式技术的有效性和不良反应:一项系统综述。
J Rehabil Med. 2025 Jan 31;57:jrm42108. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v57.42108.
5
Evaluation and Comparison of the Academic Quality of Open-Access Mega Journals and Authoritative Journals: Disruptive Innovation Evaluation.开放获取大型期刊与权威期刊学术质量的评估与比较:颠覆性创新评估
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 15;27:e59598. doi: 10.2196/59598.
6
The veracity function: integrity, and comprehensiveness of evidence.准确性函数:证据的完整性和全面性。
J Rehabil Med. 2024 Sep 30;56:jrm40350. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.40350.
7
Generalizability of Randomized Clinical Trial Outcomes for Diabetes Control Resulting From Bariatric Surgery.减肥手术对糖尿病控制的随机临床试验结果的可推广性。
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Apr 10;5(2):e414. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000414. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Shortening the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale cognitive subscale.缩短阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表。
Eur Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 23;67(1):e19. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.14.
9
Reporting of social determinants of health in randomized controlled trials conducted in the pediatric intensive care unit.儿科重症监护病房进行的随机对照试验中健康社会决定因素的报告。
Front Pediatr. 2024 Feb 1;12:1329648. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1329648. eCollection 2024.
10
Transportability of Overall Survival Estimates From US to Canadian Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Implications for Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment.从美国到加拿大晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的总体生存估计的可转移性及其对监管和卫生技术评估的影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2239874. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.39874.