Systematic reviews for policy-making - critical reflections are needed.
作者信息
Malterud Kirsti, Bjelland Anne Karen, Elvbakken Kari Tove
机构信息
Research Unit for General Practice, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
出版信息
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Nov 20;16(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0387-9.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Systematic reviews for policy-making - critical reflections are needed.用于政策制定的系统评价——需要批判性反思。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Nov 20;16(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0387-9.
2
Evidence-based medicine - an appropriate tool for evidence-based health policy? A case study from Norway.循证医学——制定循证卫生政策的合适工具？来自挪威的一个案例研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Mar 5;14:15. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0088-1.
3
Making systematic reviews more useful for policy-makers.使系统评价对政策制定者更有用。
Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Jun;83(6):480. Epub 2005 Jun 17.
4
Do evidence summaries increase policy-makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews: A systematic review protocol.证据总结能否增加政策制定者对系统评价证据的使用：一项系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 28;4:122. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0116-1.
5
[Evidence-based policy-making? The meaning of scientific knowledge in policy processes].[基于证据的政策制定？科学知识在政策过程中的意义]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Aug;144-145:78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
6
Systematic Review: A Method at Risk for Being Corrupted.系统评价：一种有被篡改风险的方法。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Jan;107(1):93-96. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303518. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
7
Subjective judgements - no more, no less? A response to Malterud, Bjelland and Elvbakken.主观判断——不多不少？对 Malterud、Bjelland 和 Elvbakken 的回应。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Nov 20;16(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0386-x.
8
Evidence based medicine: does it make a difference? Evidence base is weak and comes too late for evidence based policy making.循证医学：它有作用吗？循证基础薄弱，对于循证决策而言为时已晚。
BMJ. 2005 Jan 8;330(7482):93; discussion 94. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7482.93-a.
9
Evidence based policy making.循证决策
BMJ. 2004 Oct 30;329(7473):988-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7473.988.
10
From evidence-based medicine to evidence-based policy?从循证医学到循证政策？
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Apr;5(2):65-6. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500201.
引用本文的文献
1
"I tell you, getting data for this is hell"-Exploring the use of evidence for noncommunicable disease policies in Ghana.“我跟你说，收集这方面的数据简直是地狱”——探索加纳非传染性疾病政策的证据使用情况。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Aug 24;3(8):e0002308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002308. eCollection 2023.
2
Meta-MUMS COVID-19 web server: an online daily monitoring server for comparative and cumulative epidemiological analysis.Meta-MUMS COVID-19网络服务器：用于比较性和累积性流行病学分析的在线每日监测服务器。
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2023;31(1):37-39. doi: 10.1007/s10389-020-01433-6. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
本文引用的文献
1
Subjective judgements - no more, no less? A response to Malterud, Bjelland and Elvbakken.主观判断——不多不少？对 Malterud、Bjelland 和 Elvbakken 的回应。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Nov 20;16(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0386-x.
2
Systematic Reviews for Policymaking: Muddling Through.面向政策制定的系统评价：摸索前行。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Jan;107(1):97-99. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303557.
3
Evidence-based medicine - an appropriate tool for evidence-based health policy? A case study from Norway.循证医学——制定循证卫生政策的合适工具？来自挪威的一个案例研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Mar 5;14:15. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0088-1.
4
New directions in evidence-based policy research: a critical analysis of the literature.循证政策研究的新方向：文献的批判性分析
Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Jul 14;12:34. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-34.
5
Is it time to drop the 'knowledge translation' metaphor? A critical literature review.是否到了摒弃“知识转化”隐喻的时候了？一项批判性文献综述。
J R Soc Med. 2011 Dec;104(12):501-9. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110285.
6
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.GRADE：关于证据质量评级和推荐强度的新共识。
BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD.
7
Evidence-based health policy: context and utilisation.循证健康政策：背景与应用
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jan;58(1):207-17. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00166-7.
Zotero 插件