Suppr超能文献

应用行为分析(ABA)治疗技术有效性研究中的安慰剂组

Placebo Groups in Research on the Effectiveness of ABA Therapeutic Techniques.

作者信息

Bąbel Przemysław, Bajcar Elżbieta Anita, Marchewka Katarzyna, Sikora Katarzyna

机构信息

Pain Research Group, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.

Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 18;9:1899. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01899. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Behavior analysts have shown that a single-subject experimental design (SSED) is a useful tool for identifying the effectiveness of specific therapeutic techniques, whereas researchers outside applied behavior analysis (ABA) maintain that randomized placebo-controlled trials (RPCT) provide the most definite test of efficacy. In this paper the possible benefits that could result from supporting SSED studies by placebo control groups are discussed. However, the use of placebo groups in psychotherapy research arouses considerable controversy and many researchers argue against it. The main aim of this paper is to clarify theoretical and methodological problems associated with using placebo groups in psychotherapy research and to demonstrate that these problems can be solved if the assumptions on which they are based are reformulated. The article also discusses ethical issues about the use of placebo groups in research on the effectiveness of psychotherapy.

摘要

行为分析师表明,单受试者实验设计(SSED)是确定特定治疗技术有效性的有用工具,而应用行为分析(ABA)领域之外的研究人员则认为随机安慰剂对照试验(RPCT)能提供最确切的疗效测试。本文讨论了通过安慰剂对照组支持SSED研究可能带来的益处。然而,在心理治疗研究中使用安慰剂组引发了相当大的争议,许多研究人员对此表示反对。本文的主要目的是阐明心理治疗研究中使用安慰剂组相关的理论和方法问题,并表明如果重新阐述其基于的假设,这些问题是可以解决的。本文还讨论了在心理治疗有效性研究中使用安慰剂组的伦理问题。

相似文献

2
What makes placebo-controlled trials unethical?安慰剂对照试验为何不道德?
Am J Bioeth. 2002 Spring;2(2):3-9. doi: 10.1162/152651602317533523.
3
Placebo effect and randomized clinical trials.
Theor Med. 1995 Jun;16(2):171-82. doi: 10.1007/BF00998543.
6
Basic problems in controlled trials.对照试验中的基本问题。
J Med Ethics. 1983 Jun;9(2):80-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.9.2.80.
8
Addressing risk of bias in trials of cognitive behavioral therapy.解决认知行为疗法试验中的偏倚风险。
Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2015 Jun 25;27(3):144-8. doi: 10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.215042.
10

本文引用的文献

1
The ethics of placebo-controlled trials: methodological justifications.安慰剂对照试验的伦理:方法学依据。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Nov;36(2):510-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
2
Single-subject experimental design for evidence-based practice.基于证据的实践的单案例实验设计。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Nov;21(4):397-414. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0036). Epub 2012 Oct 15.
7
Should the single subject design be regarded as a valid alternative to the randomised controlled trial?
Postgrad Med J. 2005 Sep;81(959):546-7. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.031641.
8
A review of reinforcement control procedures.强化控制程序综述。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Summer;38(2):257-78. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.176-03.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验