Van Steenberge Maarten, Raeymaekers Joost André Maria, Hablützel Pascal István, Vanhove Maarten Pieterjan Maria, Koblmüller Stephan, Snoeks Jos
1Vertebrates Section, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Leuvensesteenweg 13, 3080 Tervuren, Belgium.
2Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, University of Leuven, Charles Deberiotstraat 32, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Front Zool. 2018 Nov 13;15:42. doi: 10.1186/s12983-018-0287-4. eCollection 2018.
Species delineation is particularly challenging in taxa with substantial intra-specific variation. In systematic studies of fishes, meristics and linear measurements that describe shape are often used to delineate species. Yet, little is known about the taxonomic value of these two types of morphological characteristics. Here, we used (Teleostei, Cichlidae) from the southern subbasin of Lake Tanganyika to test which of these types of characters best matched genetic lineages that could represent species in this group of stenotypic rock-dwelling cichlids. We further investigated intra-population variation in morphology. By linking this to a proxy of a population's age, we could assess the evolutionary stability of different kinds of morphological markers.
Morphological data was collected from 570 specimens originating from 86 localities. An AFLP approach revealed the presence of five lineages in the southern subbasin: , , sp. 'maculatus', sp. 'Mpimbwe' and . sp. 'red', which we consider to represent distinct species. Although both types of morphological data supported this classification, a comparison of P-values that describe inter-population morphological differentiation, revealed a better correspondence between the taxon delineation based on AFLP data and the patterns revealed by an analysis of meristics than between the AFLP-based taxon delineation and the patterns revealed by an analysis of shape. However, classifying southern populations of was inherently difficult as they contained a large amount of clinal variation, both in genetic and in morphological data, and both within and among species. A scenario is put forward to explain the current-day distribution of the species and colour varieties and the observed clinal variation across the subbasin's shoreline. Additionally, we observed that variation in shape was larger in populations from shallow shores whereas populations from steep shores were more variable in meristics. This difference is explained in terms of the different timescales at which small and large scale lake level fluctuations affected populations of littoral cichlids at steep and shallow shores.
Our results showed meristics to be more evolutionary stable, and of higher taxonomic value for species delimitation in , than linear measurements that describe shape. These results should be taken into account when interpreting morphological differences between populations of highly stenotypic species, such as littoral cichlids from the Great East African Lakes.
在具有大量种内变异的分类群中,物种划分尤其具有挑战性。在鱼类系统研究中,描述形状的可数性状和线性测量常常被用于划分物种。然而,对于这两类形态特征的分类学价值,我们却知之甚少。在此,我们利用坦噶尼喀湖南部子流域的 (硬骨鱼纲,丽鱼科)来测试这两类性状中哪一类与可能代表这一群狭栖性岩栖丽鱼物种的遗传谱系最匹配。我们进一步研究了种群内部的形态变异。通过将其与种群年龄的一个代理指标联系起来,我们能够评估不同类型形态标记的进化稳定性。
从86个地点采集的570个标本中收集了形态数据。一种扩增片段长度多态性(AFLP)方法揭示了南部子流域存在五个谱系: 、 、 种“maculatus”、 种“Mpimbwe”和 种“red”,我们认为这些代表了不同的物种。虽然两类形态数据都支持这一分类,但对描述种群间形态分化的P值进行比较时发现,基于AFLP数据的分类单元划分与可数性状分析所揭示的模式之间的对应性,比基于AFLP的分类单元划分与形状分析所揭示的模式之间的对应性更好。然而,对 的南部种群进行分类本质上很困难,因为它们在遗传和形态数据方面,以及在种内和种间都包含大量渐变变异。我们提出了一种情景来解释当前物种和颜色变种的分布以及整个子流域海岸线所观察到的渐变变异。此外,我们观察到浅岸种群的形状变异更大,而陡岸种群的可数性状变异更大。这种差异是根据不同时间尺度上大小不同的湖面波动对陡岸和浅岸沿岸丽鱼种群的影响来解释的。
我们的结果表明,对于 中的物种划分,可数性状比描述形状的线性测量在进化上更稳定,分类学价值更高。在解释高度狭栖性物种(如东非大湖的沿岸丽鱼)种群之间的形态差异时,应考虑这些结果。