Suppr超能文献

评估细胞死亡(凋亡)生物标志物在脓毒症中的鉴别能力。

Evaluating the discriminating capacity of cell death (apoptotic) biomarkers in sepsis.

作者信息

Duplessis Christopher, Gregory Michael, Frey Kenneth, Bell Matthew, Truong Luu, Schully Kevin, Lawler James, Langley Raymond J, Kingsmore Stephen F, Woods Christopher W, Rivers Emanuel P, Jaehne Anja K, Quackenbush Eugenia B, Fowler Vance G, Tsalik Ephraim L, Clark Danielle

机构信息

1Biological Defense Research Directorate, Naval Medical Research Center, 503 Robert Grant Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA.

2Department of Pharmacology and Center for Lung Biology, University of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, USA.

出版信息

J Intensive Care. 2018 Nov 13;6:72. doi: 10.1186/s40560-018-0341-5. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sepsis biomarker panels that provide diagnostic and prognostic discrimination in sepsis patients would be transformative to patient care. We assessed the mortality prediction and diagnostic discriminatory accuracy of two biomarkers reflective of cell death (apoptosis), circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA), and nucleosomes.

METHODS

The cfDNA and nucleosome levels were assayed in plasma samples acquired in patients admitted from four emergency departments with suspected sepsis. Subjects with non-infectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) served as controls. Samples were acquired at enrollment (T0) and 24 h later (T24). We assessed diagnostic (differentiating SIRS from sepsis) and prognostic (28-day mortality) predictive power. Models incorporating procalcitonin (diagnostic prediction) and APACHE II scores (mortality prediction) were generated.

RESULTS

Two hundred three subjects were included (107 provided procalcitonin measurements). Four subjects exhibited uncomplicated sepsis, 127 severe sepsis, 35 septic shock, and 24 had non-infectious SIRS. There were 190-survivors and 13 non-survivors. Mortality prediction models using cfDNA, nucleosomes, or APACHEII yielded AUC values of 0.61, 0.75, and 0.81, respectively. A model combining nucleosomes with the APACHE II score improved the AUC to 0.84. Diagnostic models distinguishing sepsis from SIRS using procalcitonin, cfDNA(T0), or nucleosomes(T0) yielded AUC values of 0.64, 0.65, and 0.63, respectively. The three parameter model yielded an AUC of 0.74.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first head-to-head comparison of cfDNA and nucleosomes in diagnosing sepsis and predicting sepsis-related mortality. Both cfDNA and nucleosome concentrations demonstrated a modest ability to distinguish sepsis survivors and non-survivors and provided additive diagnostic predictive accuracy in differentiating sepsis from non-infectious SIRS when integrated into a diagnostic prediction model including PCT and APACHE II. A sepsis biomarker strategy incorporating measures of the apoptotic pathway may serve as an important component of a sepsis diagnostic and mortality prediction tool.

摘要

背景

能够对脓毒症患者进行诊断和预后鉴别诊断的脓毒症生物标志物组合将给患者护理带来变革。我们评估了反映细胞死亡(凋亡)的两种生物标志物——循环游离DNA(cfDNA)和核小体的死亡率预测及诊断鉴别准确性。

方法

对来自四个急诊科、疑似脓毒症的住院患者采集的血浆样本检测cfDNA和核小体水平。非感染性全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)患者作为对照。在入组时(T0)和24小时后(T24)采集样本。我们评估了诊断(区分SIRS与脓毒症)和预后(28天死亡率)预测能力。构建了包含降钙素原(诊断预测)和APACHE II评分(死亡率预测)的模型。

结果

纳入203名受试者(107名提供了降钙素原测量值)。4名受试者为单纯性脓毒症,127名为严重脓毒症,35名为脓毒性休克,24名为非感染性SIRS。有190名幸存者和13名非幸存者。使用cfDNA、核小体或APACHE II的死亡率预测模型的AUC值分别为0.61、0.75和0.81。将核小体与APACHE II评分相结合的模型将AUC提高到0.84。使用降钙素原、cfDNA(T0)或核小体(T0)区分脓毒症与SIRS的诊断模型的AUC值分别为0.64、0.65和0.63。三参数模型的AUC为0.74。

结论

据我们所知,这是cfDNA和核小体在诊断脓毒症及预测脓毒症相关死亡率方面的首次直接比较。cfDNA和核小体浓度在区分脓毒症幸存者和非幸存者方面均表现出一定能力,并且当整合到包括PCT和APACHE II的诊断预测模型中时,在区分脓毒症与非感染性SIRS方面提供了附加的诊断预测准确性。纳入凋亡途径测量指标的脓毒症生物标志物策略可能成为脓毒症诊断和死亡率预测工具的重要组成部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce64/6234551/677464d00904/40560_2018_341_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验