Hojo Rintaro, Fukamizu Seiji, Miyazawa Satoshi, Kawamura Iwanari, Sakurada Harumizu, Hiraoka Masayasu
Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Hiroo Hospital, 2-34-10, Ebisu, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 150-0013, Japan.
Tokyo Metropolitan Health and Medical Treatment Corporation Ohkubo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019 Apr;54(3):209-215. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0489-x. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
Our aim was to elucidate the relationship between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after repeated pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).
We conducted a non-randomized observational study, with the data prospectively collected. One hundred patients (paroxysmal AF, n = 89) underwent PVI using a contact force-sensing catheter. All patients underwent an electrophysiological study and additional ablation for left atrium-pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection and non-PV foci, 6 months after the first treatment session, regardless of AF recurrence. Those with an apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15 were diagnosed with OSA. Continuous positive air pressure (CPAP) therapy was initiated after the second treatment session, based on results of a sleep study. For analysis, patients were classified into the non-OSA (n = 66), treated OSA (OSA patients undergoing CPAP; n = 11), and untreated OSA (n = 23) groups, and between-group differences evaluated.
After the first session, AF recurrence was observed in 18.2% (12/66) and 14.7% (5/34) of patients without and with OSA, respectively (P = 0.678). After the second procedure, the rate of AF recurrence was 12.1% (8/66) in the non-OSA group, 9.1% (1/11) in the treated OSA group, and 8.7% (2/23) in the untreated OSA group (log-rank P = 0.944).
The rate of AF recurrence might not be greater in patients with untreated OSA than in those without OSA and those with treated OSA after repeated PVI, using a contact force-sensing catheter, for patients with paroxysmal or short-term persistent AF.
我们的目的是阐明阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)与反复肺静脉隔离(PVI)后房颤(AF)复发之间的关系。
我们进行了一项非随机观察性研究,前瞻性收集数据。100例患者(阵发性房颤,n = 89)使用接触力感应导管进行PVI。所有患者在首次治疗后6个月均接受了电生理检查以及针对左心房 - 肺静脉(PV)重新连接和非PV灶的额外消融,无论AF是否复发。呼吸暂停低通气指数≥15的患者被诊断为OSA。根据睡眠研究结果,在第二次治疗后开始持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗。为进行分析,将患者分为非OSA组(n = 66)、接受治疗的OSA组(接受CPAP治疗的OSA患者;n = 11)和未治疗的OSA组(n = 23),并评估组间差异。
首次治疗后,无OSA患者和有OSA患者的AF复发率分别为18.2%(12/66)和14.7%(5/34)(P = 0.678)。第二次手术后,非OSA组的AF复发率为12.1%(8/66),接受治疗的OSA组为9.1%(1/11),未治疗的OSA组为8.7%(2/23)(对数秩检验P = 0.944)。
对于阵发性或短期持续性房颤患者,使用接触力感应导管进行反复PVI后,未治疗的OSA患者的AF复发率可能并不高于无OSA患者和接受治疗的OSA患者。