Suppr超能文献

使用接触力传感导管进行肺静脉隔离后,阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停与心房颤动复发之间的关系。

The relationship between obstructive sleep apnea and recurrence of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation using a contact force-sensing catheter.

作者信息

Hojo Rintaro, Fukamizu Seiji, Miyazawa Satoshi, Kawamura Iwanari, Sakurada Harumizu, Hiraoka Masayasu

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Hiroo Hospital, 2-34-10, Ebisu, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 150-0013, Japan.

Tokyo Metropolitan Health and Medical Treatment Corporation Ohkubo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019 Apr;54(3):209-215. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0489-x. Epub 2018 Nov 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Our aim was to elucidate the relationship between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after repeated pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

METHODS

We conducted a non-randomized observational study, with the data prospectively collected. One hundred patients (paroxysmal AF, n = 89) underwent PVI using a contact force-sensing catheter. All patients underwent an electrophysiological study and additional ablation for left atrium-pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection and non-PV foci, 6 months after the first treatment session, regardless of AF recurrence. Those with an apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15 were diagnosed with OSA. Continuous positive air pressure (CPAP) therapy was initiated after the second treatment session, based on results of a sleep study. For analysis, patients were classified into the non-OSA (n = 66), treated OSA (OSA patients undergoing CPAP; n = 11), and untreated OSA (n = 23) groups, and between-group differences evaluated.

RESULTS

After the first session, AF recurrence was observed in 18.2% (12/66) and 14.7% (5/34) of patients without and with OSA, respectively (P = 0.678). After the second procedure, the rate of AF recurrence was 12.1% (8/66) in the non-OSA group, 9.1% (1/11) in the treated OSA group, and 8.7% (2/23) in the untreated OSA group (log-rank P = 0.944).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of AF recurrence might not be greater in patients with untreated OSA than in those without OSA and those with treated OSA after repeated PVI, using a contact force-sensing catheter, for patients with paroxysmal or short-term persistent AF.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是阐明阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)与反复肺静脉隔离(PVI)后房颤(AF)复发之间的关系。

方法

我们进行了一项非随机观察性研究,前瞻性收集数据。100例患者(阵发性房颤,n = 89)使用接触力感应导管进行PVI。所有患者在首次治疗后6个月均接受了电生理检查以及针对左心房 - 肺静脉(PV)重新连接和非PV灶的额外消融,无论AF是否复发。呼吸暂停低通气指数≥15的患者被诊断为OSA。根据睡眠研究结果,在第二次治疗后开始持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗。为进行分析,将患者分为非OSA组(n = 66)、接受治疗的OSA组(接受CPAP治疗的OSA患者;n = 11)和未治疗的OSA组(n = 23),并评估组间差异。

结果

首次治疗后,无OSA患者和有OSA患者的AF复发率分别为18.2%(12/66)和14.7%(5/34)(P = 0.678)。第二次手术后,非OSA组的AF复发率为12.1%(8/66),接受治疗的OSA组为9.1%(1/11),未治疗的OSA组为8.7%(2/23)(对数秩检验P = 0.944)。

结论

对于阵发性或短期持续性房颤患者,使用接触力感应导管进行反复PVI后,未治疗的OSA患者的AF复发率可能并不高于无OSA患者和接受治疗的OSA患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验