East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN.
Cherokee Health Systems, TN.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2018 Dec;39(9):763-765. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000631.
A 6-year-old boy with a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) presented to primary care for a new-patient, transfer-of-care evaluation. At the initial encounter, the patient used a maximum of 60 words and was receiving speech and language therapy (SLT) through school. Family history was positive for seizures in the father and paternal grandfather as well as ASD in an older brother. Referrals to genetics, private SLT, and an autism specialist were offered, although the latter was declined by family. The subsequent genetics evaluation resulted in discovery of a small gain on chromosome 1q42.2 and associated partial duplication of the DISC1 gene. The assay could not determine the exact clinical significance of the abnormality, but similarly sized and located abnormalities involving the DISC1 gene are reported in some patients with ASD and developmental delay. During a follow-up pediatrics appointment, the father expressed his wish for further evaluation of causes of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and requested an electroencephalography (EEG) evaluation. The family concomitantly reported slow improvement in speech with therapy, the use of up to 200 words, and the ability to count to 10. The primary care physician reiterated that EEG and imaging studies are not indicated for an isolated ASD diagnosis with no supporting history or physical examination indications. The clinician discussed ASD-recommended therapies with the family. Neurology referral was made per parental request. The patient subsequently presented to neurology at the age of 7 years. The parents reiterated during the initial neurologic developmental history that the patient had shown some improvement with speech and language therapy in the past 18 months, knew as many as 200 to 300 words, and could put some words together into simple sentences. Gross and fine motor development were felt to be within the normal range for age. The parents also reported some scripting, and mild echolalia was noted on examination. Notably, there was no history of language regression. Apart from language delay, the neurologic examination was otherwise normal at initial evaluation. Given this clinical picture, ASD treatment options were again discussed. Despite education, parents continued to request for EEG evaluation as a workup for the etiology of the patient's ASD. Electroencephalography was ultimately ordered owing to the strong and repeated paternal request despite denial of any seizure-like episodes in the patient. EEG unexpectedly showed extremely frequent, almost constant focal electrographic seizures arising from the T3/T5 electrodes in the speech area of the left temporal lobe, prompting the initiation of oxcarbazepine maintenance therapy. Because of the noted abnormalities on EEG, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained. Mild abnormalities were noted on MRI study including possible minimal inferior cerebellar vermian hypoplasia, mildly prominent bodies of the lateral ventricles, and nonspecific, nonenhancing punctate T2 hyperintensities in the subcortical white matter. These findings were not felt to be clinically relevant to the patient's presentation or seizure evaluation. No repeat imaging was ordered. Hindsight is always 20/20. As a clinician evaluating the patient initially, would you have pursued further workup sooner?
一位 6 岁男孩被诊断为自闭症谱系障碍 (ASD),到初级保健机构进行新患者、转介患者的评估。初次就诊时,患者最多使用了 60 个单词,并通过学校接受言语和语言治疗 (SLT)。家族史中,父亲和祖父有癫痫病史,以及一个哥哥有 ASD 病史。向患者提供了遗传学、私人 SLT 和自闭症专家的转诊,但被家庭拒绝。随后的遗传学评估发现 1q42.2 染色体上有一个小增益,以及 DISC1 基因的部分重复。该检测无法确定该异常的具体临床意义,但据报道,一些 ASD 和发育迟缓患者中也存在类似大小和位置的 DISC1 基因异常。在随后的儿科就诊中,父亲表示希望进一步评估自闭症谱系障碍 (ASD)的病因,并要求进行脑电图 (EEG)检查。同时,家庭报告说,经过治疗,孩子的言语能力有了缓慢的改善,使用的词汇量达到了 200 个左右,并且能够数到 10。初级保健医生重申,对于没有支持病史或体格检查指征的孤立性 ASD 诊断,EEG 和影像学研究并不适用。临床医生与家庭讨论了 ASD 推荐的治疗方法。根据父母的要求,向神经科转介。随后,该患者在 7 岁时到神经科就诊。父母在最初的神经发育病史中重申,过去 18 个月来,孩子的言语和语言治疗有了一些改善,能说多达 200 到 300 个单词,并能将一些单词组合成简单的句子。大运动和精细运动发育被认为在年龄范围内正常。父母还报告说孩子有一些模仿言语,检查时发现轻度模仿言语。值得注意的是,孩子没有言语倒退的病史。除了语言迟缓,初次评估时神经系统检查其他方面均正常。鉴于这种临床表现,再次讨论了 ASD 的治疗选择。尽管进行了教育,但父母仍继续要求进行 EEG 评估,以作为患者 ASD 病因的检查。尽管患者否认有类似癫痫发作的病史,但由于父亲的强烈和反复要求,最终还是进行了 EEG 检查。EEG 出人意料地显示出极其频繁、几乎持续的局灶性脑电图癫痫发作,起源于左颞叶言语区的 T3/T5 电极,促使开始使用奥卡西平维持治疗。由于 EEG 出现了明显异常,进行了磁共振成像 (MRI)检查。MRI 检查发现了一些轻度异常,包括可能存在微小的小脑下蚓部发育不良、侧脑室体轻度突出,以及皮质下白质内非特异性、无增强点状 T2 高信号。这些发现与患者的表现或癫痫评估无临床相关性。未进行重复影像学检查。事后看来,一切总是很清楚。作为最初评估患者的临床医生,您是否会更早地进行进一步的检查?