Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, Neuherberg, Germany.
Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitüt München, Marchioninistr. 15, München, Germany.
Eur Heart J. 2019 Mar 1;40(9):732-738. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy694.
To investigate the clinical value of a lower blood pressure (BP) cut-off for Stage 1 (S1) hypertension (130-139 mmHg systolic or 80-89 mmHg diastolic) in comparison to the currently established Stage 2 (S2) cut-off (≥140/90 mmHg) in a population-based cohort.
We assessed the hypertension prevalence and associated cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in a sample of 11 603 participants (52% men, 48% women; mean 47.6 years) from the MONICA/KORA prospective study. The implementation of the new S1 cut-off increased the prevalence of hypertension from 34% to 63%. Only 24% of S2 hypertension patients were under treatment. Within a follow-up period of 10 years (70 148 person-years), 370 fatal CVD events were observed. The adjusted CVD-specific mortality rate per 1000 persons was 1.61 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-2.25] cases in S2 and 1.07 (95% CI 0.71-1.64) cases in S1 hypertension in comparison to normal BP. Cox proportional regression models were significant for the association of S2 and CVD mortality (1.54, 95% CI 1.04-2.28, P = 0.03), also in the presence of competing risks (1.47, P = 0.05). However, statistical significance for S1 hypertension was not reached (0.93, 95% CI 0.61-1.44, P = 0.76). Among S2 participants, there was a significantly higher prevalence of depressed-mood in treated patients (47%) in comparison to non-treated patients (33%) (P < 0.0001).
The lower BP cut-off substantially increased hypertension prevalence, while capturing a population with lower CVD mortality. Additionally, participants under treatment were more likely to have depressed-mood in comparison to non-treated participants, which might reflect a negative labelling effect.
在一项基于人群的队列研究中,调查与目前确立的 2 期(S2)血压(≥140/90mmHg)切点相比,较低的血压(BP)切点(130-139mmHg 收缩压或 80-89mmHg 舒张压)对 1 期(S1)高血压(130-139mmHg 收缩压或 80-89mmHg 舒张压)的临床价值。
我们评估了 MONICA/KORA 前瞻性研究中 11603 名参与者(52%为男性,48%为女性;平均年龄 47.6 岁)的高血压患病率和相关心血管疾病(CVD)事件。实施新的 S1 切点将高血压患病率从 34%提高到 63%。只有 24%的 S2 高血压患者接受了治疗。在 10 年的随访期间(70148 人年),观察到 370 例致命 CVD 事件。每 1000 人调整后的 CVD 特异性死亡率在 S2 高血压中为 1.61(95%置信区间[CI] 1.10-2.25),在 S1 高血压中为 1.07(95%CI 0.71-1.64),与正常血压相比。Cox 比例风险回归模型显示 S2 与 CVD 死亡率之间存在显著相关性(1.54,95%CI 1.04-2.28,P = 0.03),即使存在竞争风险(1.47,P = 0.05)也是如此。然而,S1 高血压的统计学意义没有达到(0.93,95%CI 0.61-1.44,P = 0.76)。在 S2 参与者中,与未治疗患者(33%)相比,治疗患者(47%)的抑郁情绪发生率明显更高(P<0.0001)。
较低的 BP 切点显著增加了高血压的患病率,同时也降低了 CVD 死亡率。此外,与未治疗的参与者相比,接受治疗的参与者更有可能出现抑郁情绪,这可能反映了一种负面的标签效应。