Chen Kangyu, Su Hao, Wang Qi, Wu Zhenqiang, Shi Rui, Yu Fei, Yan Ji, Yuan Xiaodan, Qin Rui, Zhou Ziai, Hou Zeyi, Li Chao, Chen Tao
Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Department of Geriatric Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 21;9:784433. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.784433. eCollection 2022.
Few studies investigated the concordance in hypertension status and antihypertensive treatment recommendations between the 2018 Chinese Hypertension League (CHL) guidelines and the 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines and assessed the change of premature mortality risk with hypertension defined by the ACC/AHA guidelines.
We used the baseline data of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) to estimate the population impact on hypertension management between CHL and ACC/AHA guidelines. Mortality risk from hypertension was estimated using the data from China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS). Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals(CIs).
Among 13,704 participants analyzed from the nationally representative data of CHARLS, 42.64% (95% CI: 40.35, 44.96) of Chinese adults were diagnosed by both CHL and ACC/AHA guidelines. 41.25% (39.17, 43.36) did not have hypertension according to either guideline. Overall, the concordance in hypertension status was 83.89% (81.69, 85.57). A high percentage of agreement was also found for recommendation to initiate treatment among untreated subjects (87.62% [86.67, 88.51]) and blood pressure (BP) above the goal among treated subjects (71.68% [68.16, 74.95]). Among 23,063 adults from CHNS, subjects with hypertension by CHL had a higher risk of premature mortality (1.75 [1.50, 2.04]) compared with those without hypertension. The association diminished for hypertension by ACC/AHA (1.46 [1.07, 1.30]). Moreover, the excess risk was not significant for the newly defined Grade 1 hypertension by ACC/AHA (1.15 [0.95, 1.38]) when compared with BP <120/80 mmHg. This contrasted with the estimate from CHL (1.54 [1.25, 1.89]). The same pattern was observed for total mortality.
If ACC/AHA guidelines were adopted, a high degree of concordance in hypertension status and initiation of antihypertensive treatment was found with CHL guidelines. However, the mortality risk with hypertension was reduced with a non-significant risk for Grade 1 hypertension defined by the ACC/AHA.
很少有研究调查2018年中国高血压联盟(CHL)指南与2017年美国心脏病学会(ACC)/美国心脏协会(AHA)指南在高血压状态和降压治疗建议方面的一致性,并评估根据ACC/AHA指南定义的高血压导致的过早死亡风险变化。
我们使用中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)的基线数据来估计CHL和ACC/AHA指南对高血压管理的人群影响。使用中国健康与营养调查(CHNS)的数据估计高血压导致的死亡风险。采用Cox比例风险模型估计风险比(HR)及其95%置信区间(CI)。
在从CHARLS具有全国代表性的数据中分析的13704名参与者中,42.64%(95%CI:40.35,44.96)的中国成年人被CHL和ACC/AHA指南均诊断为高血压。41.25%(39.17,43.36)的人根据任何一个指南都没有高血压。总体而言,高血压状态的一致性为83.89%(81.69,85.57)。在未治疗的受试者中,启动治疗的建议一致性也很高(87.62%[86.67,88.51]),在接受治疗的受试者中,血压高于目标值的一致性为71.68%(68.16,74.95)。在来自CHNS的23063名成年人中,CHL诊断为高血压的受试者过早死亡风险较高(1.75[1.50,2.04]),而无高血压者风险较低。ACC/AHA定义的高血压的相关性有所降低(1.46[1.07,1.30])。此外,与血压<120/80 mmHg相比,ACC/AHA新定义的1级高血压的额外风险不显著(1.15[0.95,1.38])。这与CHL的估计结果(1.54[1.25,1.89])形成对比。总死亡率也观察到相同的模式。
如果采用ACC/AHA指南,在高血压状态和启动降压治疗方面与CHL指南有高度一致性。然而,ACC/AHA定义的高血压导致的死亡风险降低,1级高血压风险不显著。