Acute Medicine, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE.
Value Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Mar 16;22(3):440-445. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty252.
Hospitalization and post-discharge provide an opportune time for tobacco cessation. This study tested the feasibility, uptake, and cessation outcomes of a hospital-based tobacco cessation program, delivered by volunteers to the bedside with post-discharge referral to Quitline services. Patient characteristics associated with Quitline uptake and cessation were assessed.
Between February and November 2016, trained hospital volunteers approached inpatient tobacco users on six pilot units. Volunteers shared a cessation brochure and used the ASK-ADVISE-CONNECT model to connect ready to quit patients to the Delaware Quitline via fax-referral. Volunteers administered a follow-up survey to all admitted tobacco users via telephone or email at 3-months post-discharge.
Of the 743 admitted tobacco users, 531 (72%) were visited by a volunteer, and 97% (531/547) of those approached, accepted the visit. Over one-third (201/531; 38%) were ready to quit and fax-referred to the Quitline, and 36% of those referred accepted Quitline services. At 3 months post-discharge, 37% (135/368) reported not using tobacco in the last 30 days; intent-to-treat cessation rate was 18% (135/743). In a multivariable regression model of Quitline fax-referral completion, receiving nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) during hospitalization was the strongest predictor (odds ratios [OR] = 1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.34 to 2.90). In a model of 3-month cessation, receiving Quitline services (OR = 3.21, 95% CI = 1.35 to 7.68) and having coronary artery disease (OR = 2.28; 95% CI = 1.11 to 4.68) were associated with tobacco cessation, but a volunteer visit was not.
An "opt-out" tobacco cessation service using trained volunteers is feasible for connecting patients to Quitline services.
This study demonstrates the feasibility of a systems-based approach to link inpatients to evidence-based treatment for tobacco use. This model used trained bedside volunteers to connect inpatients to a state-funded Quitline after discharge that offers free cessation treatment of telephone coaching and cessation medications. Receiving NRT during hospitalization positively impacted Quitline referral, and engagement with Quitline resources was critical to tobacco abstinence post-discharge. Future work is needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and sustainability of this volunteer model.
住院和出院后提供了戒烟的机会。本研究测试了一种基于医院的戒烟计划的可行性、参与度和戒烟效果,该计划由志愿者在床边提供,出院后转介至戒烟热线服务。评估了与戒烟热线参与和戒烟相关的患者特征。
在 2016 年 2 月至 11 月期间,经过培训的医院志愿者在六个试点单位接触住院烟草使用者。志愿者分享了一份戒烟小册子,并使用 ASK-ADVISE-CONNECT 模型,通过传真将准备戒烟的患者转介到特拉华州戒烟热线。志愿者在出院后 3 个月通过电话或电子邮件向所有住院的烟草使用者进行了随访调查。
在 743 名住院的烟草使用者中,有 531 名(72%)接受了志愿者的访问,其中 97%(531/547)的受访者接受了访问。超过三分之一(201/531;38%)的人准备戒烟并通过传真转介至戒烟热线,其中 36%的转介者接受了戒烟热线服务。在出院后 3 个月,37%(135/368)报告在过去 30 天内没有使用烟草;意向治疗戒烟率为 18%(135/743)。在完成戒烟热线传真转介的多变量回归模型中,住院期间接受尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)是最强的预测因素(比值比[OR] = 1.97;95%置信区间[CI] = 1.34 至 2.90)。在 3 个月的戒烟模型中,接受戒烟热线服务(OR = 3.21,95% CI = 1.35 至 7.68)和患有冠状动脉疾病(OR = 2.28;95% CI = 1.11 至 4.68)与戒烟有关,但志愿者访问没有关系。
使用经过培训的志愿者提供的“选择退出”戒烟服务,将患者与戒烟热线服务联系起来是可行的。
本研究证明了一种基于系统的方法,通过训练有素的床边志愿者将住院患者与基于证据的烟草使用治疗联系起来是可行的。该模型使用经过培训的床边志愿者在出院后将住院患者转介至由州政府资助的戒烟热线,该热线提供免费的戒烟治疗,包括电话辅导和戒烟药物。住院期间接受 NRT 治疗对戒烟热线转介有积极影响,与戒烟热线资源的接触对出院后的烟草戒断至关重要。需要进一步研究评估这种志愿者模式的成本效益和可持续性。