North John H, Gore Jeffrey, Catchot Angus L, Cook Donald R, Dodds Darrin M, Musser Fred R
Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology, and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS.
Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS.
J Econ Entomol. 2019 Feb 12;112(1):341-348. doi: 10.1093/jee/toy339.
Current assessments from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency suggest that some current insecticides may be lost or severely restricted in the near future. An experiment was conducted from 2014 to 2015 at two locations in Mississippi to determine the impact of losses of insecticide classes on integrated pest management of insect pests in cotton. The treatments included cotton treated with all available classes of insecticides, cotton treated with all classes except neonicotinoids, cotton treated with all classes except pyrethroids, cotton treated with all classes except carbamates and organophosphates, and an untreated control. Plots were scouted weekly and insecticide applications were made with the most efficacious and economical insecticides for each treatment when that treatment reached threshold for a particular insect pest(s). The primary insects at both locations were tobacco thrips and tarnished plant bugs. Thrips pressure was similar at both locations and generally showed that all insecticide treatments provided a similar level of protection compared with the untreated control. At the Stoneville location where tarnished plant bug pressure was greatest, cotton yields and economic returns differed between plots where all classes of insecticides were applied compared with the untreated control and where neonicotinoids were excluded. However, in Starkville where tarnished plant bug pressure was less, there were no differences among treatments. Although yield and economic returns were similar in high tarnished plant bug pressure areas when using all classes compared with managing without pyrethroids or organophosphates, a rotation among all insecticide classes should be beneficial for resistance management in Mid-South cotton production.
美国环境保护局目前的评估表明,一些现有的杀虫剂在不久的将来可能会流失或受到严格限制。2014年至2015年在密西西比州的两个地点进行了一项实验,以确定各类杀虫剂流失对棉花害虫综合防治的影响。处理措施包括用所有可用类别的杀虫剂处理的棉花、用除新烟碱类之外的所有类别处理的棉花、用除拟除虫菊酯类之外的所有类别处理的棉花、用除氨基甲酸酯类和有机磷类之外的所有类别处理的棉花,以及一个未处理的对照。每周对试验区进行巡查,当某一处理达到特定害虫的阈值时,就使用对该处理最有效且最经济的杀虫剂进行施药。两个地点的主要害虫是烟蓟马和牧草盲蝽。两个地点的蓟马压力相似,总体表明与未处理的对照相比,所有杀虫剂处理提供的保护水平相似。在牧草盲蝽压力最大的斯通维尔地点,与未处理的对照以及排除新烟碱类的试验区相比,施用所有类别杀虫剂的试验区的棉花产量和经济回报有所不同。然而,在牧草盲蝽压力较小的斯塔克维尔,各处理之间没有差异。尽管在牧草盲蝽压力大的地区,使用所有类别杀虫剂时的产量和经济回报与不使用拟除虫菊酯类或有机磷类进行管理时相似,但在中南部棉花生产中,各类杀虫剂轮换使用应有利于抗性管理。