Department of Agricultural Science, University of Napoli Federico II, 80055 Portici, NA, Italy.
Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2010, USA.
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Nov 20;19(11):3671. doi: 10.3390/ijms19113671.
In the last 100 years, agricultural developments have favoured selection for highly productive crops, a fact that has been commonly associated with loss of key traits for environmental stress tolerance. We argue here that this is not exactly the case. We reason that high yield under near optimal environments came along with of plant stress perception and consequently of stress avoidance mechanisms, such as slow growth, which were originally needed for survival over long evolutionary time periods. Therefore, mechanisms employed by plants to cope with a stressful environment during evolution were overwhelmingly geared to avoid detrimental effects so as to ensure survival and that plant stress "tolerance" is fundamentally and evolutionarily based on "avoidance" of injury and death which may be referred to as evolutionary avoidance (EVOL-Avoidance). As a consequence, slow growth results from being exposed to stress because genes and genetic programs to adjust growth rates to external circumstances have evolved as a survival but not productivity strategy that has allowed extant plants to avoid extinction. To improve productivity under moderate stressful conditions, the evolution-oriented plant stress response circuits must be changed from a survival mode to a continued productivity mode or to the evolutionary avoidance response, as it were. This may be referred to as Agricultural (AGRI-Avoidance). Clearly, highly productive crops have kept the slow, reduced growth response to stress that they evolved to ensure survival. Breeding programs and genetic engineering have not succeeded to genetically remove these responses because they are polygenic and redundantly programmed. From the beginning of modern plant breeding, we have not fully appreciated that our crop plants react overly-cautiously to stress conditions. They over-reduce growth to be able to survive stresses for a period of time much longer than a cropping season. If we are able to remove this polygenic redundant survival safety net we may improve yield in moderately stressful environments, yet we will face the requirement to replace it with either an emergency slow or no growth (dormancy) response to extreme stress or use resource management to rescue crops under extreme stress (or both).
在过去的 100 年中,农业的发展有利于选择高产作物,这一事实通常与丧失对环境胁迫耐受性的关键特性有关。我们在这里认为事实并非如此。我们认为,在接近最佳环境下的高产量伴随着植物对胁迫感知的能力的增强,因此也伴随着胁迫回避机制的增强,例如缓慢生长,这是为了在漫长的进化时期内生存而最初需要的。因此,植物在进化过程中用来应对胁迫环境的机制主要是避免有害影响,以确保生存,植物胁迫“耐受”本质上是基于避免伤害和死亡,这可以被称为进化回避(EVOL-Avoidance)。因此,由于暴露于胁迫中,导致生长缓慢,因为调整生长速率以适应外部环境的基因和遗传程序已经进化为一种生存但不是生产力的策略,使现存植物得以避免灭绝。为了在适度胁迫条件下提高生产力,必须将面向进化的植物应激反应回路从生存模式转变为持续的生产力模式,或者转变为进化回避反应,也就是所谓的农业回避(AGRI-Avoidance)。显然,高产作物保持了它们进化过程中为确保生存而产生的对胁迫的缓慢、减少的生长反应。由于这些反应是多基因的并且冗余编程,因此,育种计划和基因工程尚未成功地从遗传上消除这些反应。从现代植物育种开始,我们还没有完全意识到我们的作物植物对胁迫条件反应过度谨慎。它们过度减少生长,以便能够在比一个作物季节长得多的时间内生存下来。如果我们能够消除这种多基因冗余的生存安全网,我们可能会在适度胁迫的环境中提高产量,但我们将面临需要用极端胁迫下的紧急缓慢或无生长(休眠)反应或资源管理来替代它,以挽救处于极端胁迫下的作物(或两者兼而有之)。