• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性护理手术中“拖出式”与“推入式”经皮内镜下胃造口术的结局比较:拖出式经皮内镜下胃造口术胃管移位发生率报告不足

Comparing Outcomes Between "Pull" Versus "Push" Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Acute Care Surgery: Under-Reported Pull Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Incidence of Tube Dislodgement.

作者信息

Kulvatunyou Narong, Zimmerman Steven A, Sadoun Moutamn, Joseph Bellal A, Friese Randall S, Gries Lynn M, O'Keeffe Terence, Tang Andrew L

机构信息

Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.

Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2018 Dec;232:56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jul 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.011
PMID:30463774
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) complications are often under-reported in the literature, especially regarding the incidence of tube dislodgement (TD). TD can cause significant morbidity depending on its timing. We compared outcomes between "push" and "pull" PEGs. We hypothesized that push PEGs, because of its T-fasteners and balloon tip, would have a lower incidence of TD and complications compared with pull PEGs.

METHODS

We performed a chart review of our prospectively maintained acute care surgery database for patients who underwent PEG tube placement from July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2013. Data regarding age, gender, body mass index, indications (trauma versus nontrauma), and complications (including TD) were extracted. Procedure-related complications were classified as either major if patients required an operative intervention or minor if they did not. We compared outcomes between pull PEG and push PEG. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with major complications.

RESULTS

During the 4-y study period, 264 patients underwent pull PEGs and 59 underwent push PEGs. Age, gender, body mass index, and indications were similar between the two groups. The overall complications (major and minor) were similar (20% pull versus 22% push, P = 0.61). The incidence of TD was also similar (12% pull versus 9% push, P = 0.49). However, TD associated with major complications was higher in pull PEGs but was not statistically significant (6% pull versus 2% push, P = 0.21). Multiple regression analysis showed that dislodged pull PEG was associated with major complications (odds ratio 29.5; 95% confidence interval, 11.3-76.9; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of pull PEG TD associated with major complications is under-recognized. Specific measures should be undertaken to help prevent pull PEG TD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, therapeutic.

摘要

背景

经皮内镜下胃造口术(PEG)并发症在文献中常常报道不足,尤其是关于导管移位(TD)的发生率。TD根据其发生时间可导致显著的发病率。我们比较了“推式”和“拉式”PEG的结局。我们假设,由于其T形固定器和球囊尖端,推式PEG与拉式PEG相比,TD和并发症的发生率会更低。

方法

我们对前瞻性维护的急性护理手术数据库进行了图表回顾,纳入了2009年7月1日至2013年6月30日期间接受PEG管置入的患者。提取了有关年龄、性别、体重指数、适应证(创伤与非创伤)和并发症(包括TD)的数据。与手术相关的并发症如果患者需要手术干预则分类为严重并发症,如果不需要则分类为轻微并发症。我们比较了拉式PEG和推式PEG的结局。进行多因素回归分析以确定与严重并发症相关的危险因素。

结果

在4年的研究期间,264例患者接受了拉式PEG,59例患者接受了推式PEG。两组之间的年龄、性别、体重指数和适应证相似。总体并发症(严重和轻微)相似(拉式20%对推式22%,P = 0.61)。TD的发生率也相似(拉式12%对推式9%,P = 0.49)。然而,与严重并发症相关的TD在拉式PEG中更高,但无统计学意义(拉式6%对推式2%,P = 0.21)。多因素回归分析显示,移位的拉式PEG与严重并发症相关(比值比29.5;95%置信区间,11.3 - 76.9;P < 0.001)。

结论

与严重并发症相关的拉式PEG TD的发生率未得到充分认识。应采取具体措施以帮助预防拉式PEG TD。

证据级别

IV,治疗性。

相似文献

1
Comparing Outcomes Between "Pull" Versus "Push" Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Acute Care Surgery: Under-Reported Pull Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Incidence of Tube Dislodgement.急性护理手术中“拖出式”与“推入式”经皮内镜下胃造口术的结局比较:拖出式经皮内镜下胃造口术胃管移位发生率报告不足
J Surg Res. 2018 Dec;232:56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
2
Pediatric gastrostomy tubes and techniques: making safer and cleaner choices.小儿胃造口管及其技术:做出更安全、更清洁的选择。
J Surg Res. 2017 Dec;220:88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.06.075. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
3
Contemporary acute care surgery percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement: an extreme bumper height and complications.当代急性外科经皮内镜胃造口管放置术:极端的 bumper 高度和并发症。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Nov;75(5):859-63. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182a74b4d.
4
Comparison of 231 patients receiving either "pull-through" or "push" percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.231例接受“拖出式”或“推入式”经皮内镜下胃造口术患者的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jan;29(1):170-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3673-9. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
5
To push or to pull? A clinical audit on the efficacy and safety of the pull and push percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy techniques in oncological patients.推还是拉?经皮内镜胃造口术推/pull 技术在肿瘤患者中的疗效和安全性的临床审计。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2023 Dec;11(10):951-959. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12467. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
6
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) with T-fasteners obviates the need for emergent replacement after early tube dislodgement.经皮内镜胃造口术(PEG)使用 T 型紧固件可避免早期管脱出后紧急更换。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Dec;26(12):3541-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2348-7. Epub 2012 May 31.
7
Push versus pull gastrostomy in cancer patients: A single center retrospective analysis of complications and technical success rates.推 versus 拉胃造口术在癌症患者中的应用:单中心回顾性并发症分析和技术成功率。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2018 Sep;99(9):547-553. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
8
Outcomes of radiologically inserted gastrostomy versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.放射介入下胃造口术与经皮内镜下胃造口术的结局比较
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019 Oct;63(5):610-616. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12932. Epub 2019 Aug 11.
9
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement using the pull-through or push-through techniques: is the second pass of the gastroscope necessary?使用拉出式或推进式技术进行经皮内镜下胃造口术:胃镜的第二次插入有必要吗?
Endoscopy. 1996 Oct;28(8):686-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1005577.
10
'Push' versus 'pull' percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with advanced head and neck cancer.晚期头颈癌患者经皮内镜下胃造口术置管的“推”与“拉”技术比较
Laryngoscope. 2003 Nov;113(11):1898-902. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200311000-00007.

引用本文的文献

1
[Gastro-Colo-Cutaneous Fistula Occurring After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Procedure].经皮内镜下胃造口术后发生的胃-结肠-皮肤瘘
Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res. 2024 Mar;24(1):72-76. doi: 10.7704/kjhugr.2023.0060. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
2
Retrospective study on safety and complications of direct percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children below 10 kg.10公斤以下儿童直接经皮内镜下胃造口术安全性及并发症的回顾性研究
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2025 Aug;81(2):417-420. doi: 10.1002/jpn3.70085. Epub 2025 May 22.
3
Percutaneous Gastrostomies: Associated Complications in PUSH vs. PULL Techniques over 12 Years in a Referral Centre.
经皮胃造口术:在一家转诊中心12年里推式与拉式技术相关并发症情况
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 22;13(7):1836. doi: 10.3390/jcm13071836.
4
Gastrostomies: experience and complications with three modalities in a tertiary centre over a 26-year period.胃造口术:一家三级医疗中心26年间三种方式的经验与并发症
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 17;10:1191204. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1191204. eCollection 2023.
5
Gastrostomy tubes: Fundamentals, periprocedural considerations, and best practices.胃造口管:基础、围手术期注意事项及最佳实践。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Apr 27;14(4):286-303. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i4.286.