Sutherland Cabrini, Carr Benjamin, Biddle Kassia Zalewski, Jarboe Marcus, Gadepalli Samir K
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
J Surg Res. 2017 Dec;220:88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.06.075. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
Gastrostomy tube placement is a common procedure that can be accomplished with a variety of techniques, each with its attendant complications. In an effort to standardize practice at our institution, we retrospectively evaluated complications including early dislodgement requiring operative repair, leaks, and granulation tissue to determine the optimal technique.
A retrospective cohort study (June 2008-July 2014) evaluating children (<18) receiving gastrostomy tubes was completed. We recorded demographic data, placement technique, and postoperative complications within 120 days. The seven techniques in use at our institution were categorized into three groups: standard pull-type techniques for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies (PEGs), "push" techniques using transabdominal sutures or T-fasteners for securement of the stomach, and "fascial" techniques using sutures directly from the stomach to the abdominal fascia at the stoma site. Descriptive statistics were analyzed using t test and Kruskal-Wallis tests as appropriate, and outcomes with P < 0.05 were considered significant.
Of the 450 patients, 255 (56.7%) were male. Median age and weight at the time of operation were 19.3 months (interquartile range, 6.5-89.6 months) and 9.0 kg (interquartile range, 5.7-17.1 kg) respectively. By technique, 245 patients underwent fascial placement (54.4%), 112 underwent push (24.9 %), and 93 underwent PEG (20.7%). Push and fascial techniques were less likely become dislodged than PEG, with odds ratios (ORs) of 0.14 (confidence interval CI 0.02-0.66) and 0.31 (CI 0.11-0.83), respectively. Fascial techniques had more granulation tissue than either push or PEG pull methods, OR 2.39 (CI 1.20-3.36), and more leakage, OR 2.22 (CI 1.19-4.15).
Dislodgement is most likely with PEG techniques. Granulation and leakage are most likely with fascial suture techniques. Push techniques are associated with the lowest complication rate.
胃造口管置入是一种常见的操作,可通过多种技术完成,每种技术都有其相应的并发症。为了规范我们机构的操作,我们回顾性评估了包括需要手术修复的早期移位、渗漏和肉芽组织等并发症,以确定最佳技术。
完成了一项回顾性队列研究(2008年6月至2014年7月),评估接受胃造口管置入的儿童(<18岁)。我们记录了人口统计学数据、置入技术和120天内的术后并发症。我们机构使用的七种技术分为三组:经皮内镜胃造口术(PEG)的标准牵拉式技术、使用经腹缝线或T型钉固定胃的“推送”技术,以及在造口部位直接从胃到腹壁筋膜使用缝线的“筋膜”技术。根据情况使用t检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验分析描述性统计数据,P<0.05的结果被认为具有统计学意义。
450例患者中,255例(56.7%)为男性。手术时的中位年龄和体重分别为19.3个月(四分位间距,6.5-89.6个月)和9.0千克(四分位间距,5.7-17.1千克)。按技术分类,245例患者采用筋膜置入(54.4%),112例采用推送技术(24.9%),93例采用PEG(20.7%)。推送技术和筋膜技术比PEG技术移位的可能性更小,优势比(OR)分别为0.14(置信区间CI 0.02-0.66)和0.31(CI 0.11-0.83)。筋膜技术比推送技术或PEG牵拉技术有更多的肉芽组织,OR为2.39(CI 1.20-3.36),渗漏也更多,OR为2.22(CI 1.19-4.15)。
PEG技术最易发生移位。筋膜缝合技术最易出现肉芽组织和渗漏。推送技术的并发症发生率最低。