Weng Yi Ming, Peng Min, Hu Meng Xue, Yao Yi, Song Qi Bin
Department of Oncology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China,
Onco Targets Ther. 2018 Oct 30;11:7529-7542. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S167865. eCollection 2018.
We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the impact of different clinical and molecular characteristics on the efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. PubMed and Web of Science were searched for related trials. Eleven eligible studies, comprising 5,663 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. We found that the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor was associated with a 31% reduction in the risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]=0.69; 95% CI 0.64-0.74; <0.00001) for patients with melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), urothelial carcinoma, head and neck carcinoma, and renal cell carcinoma. In subgroup analyses, all the patients with PD-L1-positive tumors had overall survival (OS) benefits from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors regardless of PD-L1 expression level, and a dose-effect relationship between the expression of PD-L1 and OS benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors was observed. There was an OS improvement for patients with a smoking history (<0.00001), but no OS benefit was observed for nonsmokers (=0.28). In addition, first-line therapy had better OS than second-line or later treatment (=0.02). No significant improvement of OS was observed (=0.70) in patients aged ≥75 years. The relative treatment efficacy was similar according to sex (male vs female, =0.60), performance status (0 vs ≥1, =0.68), tumor histology (squamous NSCLC vs non-squamous NSCLC vs melanoma vs urothelial carcinoma vs head and neck carcinoma vs renal cell carcinoma, =0.64), and treatment type (PD-1 inhibitor vs PD-L1 inhibitor, =0.36). In conclusion, PD-L1-positive tumors, smoking history, and first-line treatment were potential factors for the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Patients with higher PD-L1 expression might achieve greater OS benefits. In addition, sex, performance status, tumor histology, and treatment type could not predict the efficacy of this therapy. In contrast, patients aged >75 years and nonsmokers might not get OS benefits from this treatment. These results may improve treatment strategies and patient selection for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.
我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估不同临床和分子特征对程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)或程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)抑制剂疗效的影响。通过检索PubMed和Web of Science查找相关试验。本荟萃分析纳入了11项符合条件的研究,共5663例患者。我们发现,对于黑色素瘤、非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)、尿路上皮癌、头颈癌和肾细胞癌患者,PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂可使死亡风险降低31%(风险比[HR]=0.69;95%置信区间0.64-0.74;P<0.00001)。在亚组分析中,所有PD-L1阳性肿瘤患者无论PD-L1表达水平如何,均可从PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂中获得总生存期(OS)益处,并且观察到PD-L1表达与PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂的OS益处之间存在剂量效应关系。有吸烟史的患者OS有所改善(P<0.00001),但未观察到非吸烟者有OS益处(P=0.28)。此外,一线治疗的OS优于二线或更晚期治疗(P=0.02)。≥75岁患者未观察到OS有显著改善(P=0.70)。根据性别(男性与女性,P=0.60)、体能状态(0与≥1,P=0.68)、肿瘤组织学(鳞状NSCLC与非鳞状NSCLC与黑色素瘤与尿路上皮癌与头颈癌与肾细胞癌,P=0.64)以及治疗类型(PD-1抑制剂与PD-L1抑制剂,P=0.36),相对治疗疗效相似。总之,PD-L1阳性肿瘤、吸烟史和一线治疗是PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂疗效的潜在因素。PD-L1表达较高的患者可能获得更大的OS益处。此外,性别、体能状态、肿瘤组织学和治疗类型无法预测该治疗的疗效。相比之下,>75岁患者和非吸烟者可能无法从该治疗中获得OS益处。这些结果可能会改善PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂的治疗策略和患者选择。