Reynolds Alan W, Liu Guodong, Kocis Paul T, Skowronski Jenna N, Leslie Douglas L, Fox Edward J
Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, U.S.A.
Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, U.S.A.
Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Jun 12;16(3):e12104. doi: 10.5812/ijem.12104. eCollection 2018 Jul.
Several different classes of medications have been shown to be efficacious at preventing fractures in patients with osteoporosis. No study has compared real world efficacy at preventing fractures between all currently approved medications.
To directly compare the efficacy of all currently available osteoporosis medications by using a large population claims database.
The Truven Health Analytics MarketScan database from 2008 - 2012 was used to identify all patients who started a new osteoporosis medication. Patients who experienced a fracture after at least 12 months of treatment were identified and risk factors for fracture for all patients were recorded. Logistic regression was used to account for and quantify the contribution of risk factors, and to make direct comparisons between different osteoporosis medications.
A total of 51649 patients were included in the cohort, with an average age of 56 years. The overall incidence rate of fracture was 1.55 per 100 person - years of treatment. Orally administered medications had the lowest fracture rates, led by raloxifene and alendronate (1.24 and 1.54 respectively), while parenterally administered medications including teriparatide and zolerdonic acid had the highest rates (3.90 and 1.98 respectively). No statistically significant differences found between oral or parenterally administered bisphosphonate medications.
While patients taking orally administered drugs including bisphosphonates had less frequent incident fracture no statistically significant differences were found between most drugs in head - to - head comparisons, even considering the route of administration of bisphosphonates. These findings support previous evidence that minimal differences in efficacy exist between different osteoporosis medications. This is the first study using a large database to compare all currently available osteoporosis treatments and will hopefully be augmented by further study to provide more evidence to make clinical decisions on osteoporosis medication use.
已证明几种不同类型的药物在预防骨质疏松症患者骨折方面有效。尚无研究比较所有当前获批药物在预防骨折方面的实际疗效。
通过使用大型人群索赔数据库直接比较所有当前可用的骨质疏松症药物的疗效。
使用2008年至2012年的Truven Health Analytics MarketScan数据库来识别所有开始使用新的骨质疏松症药物的患者。确定在至少12个月治疗后发生骨折的患者,并记录所有患者的骨折风险因素。使用逻辑回归来考虑和量化风险因素的贡献,并对不同的骨质疏松症药物进行直接比较。
该队列共纳入51649名患者,平均年龄56岁。骨折的总体发病率为每100人年治疗1.55例。口服药物的骨折率最低,以雷洛昔芬和阿仑膦酸盐为首(分别为1.24和1.54),而包括特立帕肽和唑来膦酸在内的胃肠外给药药物的骨折率最高(分别为3.90和1.98)。口服或胃肠外给药的双膦酸盐药物之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。
虽然服用包括双膦酸盐在内的口服药物的患者骨折发生率较低,但在直接比较中,大多数药物之间未发现统计学上的显著差异,即使考虑双膦酸盐的给药途径也是如此。这些发现支持了先前的证据,即不同的骨质疏松症药物在疗效上存在极小差异。这是第一项使用大型数据库比较所有当前可用的骨质疏松症治疗方法(的研究),有望通过进一步研究得到补充,以提供更多证据来指导关于骨质疏松症药物使用的临床决策。