Suppr超能文献

虚拟现实提示暴露疗法戒烟的随机临床试验。

A randomized clinical trial of cue exposure treatment through virtual reality for smoking cessation.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, 1 S. Prospect St. UHC OH3 MS 482, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Plaza Feijoo s/n, Oviedo, 33003, Spain.

出版信息

J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Jan;96:26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 16.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cue-induced craving is a major motivator of smoking behavior, and, more importantly, a predictor of relapse. Previous studies demonstrated that cue exposure treatment (CET) reduces both cue-induced craving and daily nicotine intake in smokers. However, the efficacy of CET for smoking cessation has rarely been tested in controlled trials. This two-site randomized clinical trial explored the effectiveness of a CET procedure in combination with a Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment (CBT) for smoking cessation among treatment-seeking patients from the general population.

METHODS

One hundred and two smokers were randomly assigned to one of two treatment conditions: CBT (n = 52) or CBT + CET (n = 50). The CBT intervention involved group-based sessions over the course of 6 weeks. In addition to CBT, participants in the CBT + CET condition received 5 individual sessions of CET through virtual reality.

RESULTS

The CBT + CET group showed a significant reduction in cue-induced craving. However, there were no significant differences in either retention nor abstinence rates between CBT and CBT + CET in any assessment period (end-of-treatment, 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up). Moreover, a higher rate of relapse over a 12-month follow-up period was found in the CBT + CET group compared to the CBT group (Wald χ = 4.796, p = .029).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings support and expand previous evidence by showing that a CET protocol does not increase the effectiveness of a CBT intervention for smoking cessation among treatment-seeking smokers. Moreover, this study also reveals that CET may increase risk of relapse among nicotine-dependent individuals who successfully achieve abstinence. Until the mechanisms underlying the effect of CET are identified, researchers and clinicians should be cautious when utilizing this protocol.

摘要

简介

线索诱发的渴望是吸烟行为的主要动机,更重要的是,它是复吸的预测指标。先前的研究表明,线索暴露治疗(CET)可降低吸烟者的线索诱发渴望和每日尼古丁摄入量。然而,CET 对戒烟的疗效在对照试验中很少得到检验。这项两站点随机临床试验探讨了 CET 程序与认知行为治疗(CBT)相结合在寻求治疗的普通人群中的吸烟患者中戒烟的有效性。

方法

102 名吸烟者被随机分配到两种治疗条件之一:CBT(n=52)或 CBT+CET(n=50)。CBT 干预包括 6 周的基于小组的课程。除了 CBT,CET+CBT 组的参与者还通过虚拟现实接受了 5 次单独的 CET 治疗。

结果

CET+CBT 组的线索诱发渴望明显减少。然而,在任何评估期(治疗结束时、1 个月、6 个月和 12 个月随访),CBT 和 CBT+CET 之间在保留率或戒烟率方面均无显著差异。此外,在 12 个月的随访期间,CET+CBT 组的复发率高于 CBT 组(Wald χ=4.796,p=0.029)。

结论

研究结果支持并扩展了先前的证据,表明 CET 方案不会增加 CBT 干预对寻求治疗的吸烟者戒烟的效果。此外,本研究还表明,CET 可能会增加成功戒烟的尼古丁依赖者复发的风险。在确定 CET 效果的机制之前,研究人员和临床医生在使用该方案时应谨慎。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验