Germundsson Per, Manchaiah Vinaya, Ratinaud Pierre, Tympas Aristotle, Danermark Berth
a The Department of Social Work , Malmö University , Malmö , Sweden.
b Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences , Lamar University , Beaumont , TX , USA.
Int J Audiol. 2018 Dec;57(12):925-932. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1516894.
This study aims to understand patterns in the social representation of hearing loss reported by adults across different countries and explore the impact of different demographic factors on response patterns. The study used a cross-sectional survey design. Data were collected using a free association task and analysed using qualitative content analysis, cluster analysis and chi-square analysis. The study sample included 404 adults (18 years and over) in the general population from four countries (India, Iran, Portugal and UK). The cluster analysis included 380 responses out of 404 (94.06%) and resulted in five clusters. The clusters were named: (1) individual aspects; (2) aetiology; (3) the surrounding society; (4) limitations and (5) exposed. Various demographic factors (age, occupation type, education and country) showed an association with different clusters, although country of origin seemed to be associated with most clusters. The study results suggest that how hearing loss is represented in adults in general population varies and is mainly related to country of origin. These findings strengthen the argument about cross-cultural differences in perception of hearing loss, which calls for a need to make necessary accommodations while developing public health strategies about hearing loss.
本研究旨在了解不同国家成年人报告的听力损失社会表征模式,并探讨不同人口统计学因素对反应模式的影响。该研究采用横断面调查设计。通过自由联想任务收集数据,并使用定性内容分析、聚类分析和卡方分析进行分析。研究样本包括来自四个国家(印度、伊朗、葡萄牙和英国)的404名普通成年人(18岁及以上)。聚类分析包括404份回复中的380份(94.06%),并得出了五个聚类。这些聚类被命名为:(1)个人方面;(2)病因;(3)周围社会;(4)局限性;(5)暴露。各种人口统计学因素(年龄、职业类型、教育程度和国家)与不同的聚类存在关联,尽管原籍国似乎与大多数聚类相关。研究结果表明,普通人群中成年人对听力损失的表征方式各不相同,且主要与原籍国有关。这些发现强化了关于听力损失认知方面跨文化差异的论点,这就要求在制定有关听力损失的公共卫生策略时进行必要的调整。