Kang Kyungnam, Kim Kyoung-Youm, Kim Jungho
Opt Express. 2018 Oct 29;26(22):A955-A973. doi: 10.1364/OE.26.00A955.
We theoretically compare the excitation efficiency of waveguide and surface plasmon modes between quantum-mechanical and classical electromagnetic optical models of organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs). A sophisticated optical model combining the two approaches is required to obtain an accurate calculation result and a comprehensive understanding of the micro-cavity effect in OLEDs. In the quantum-mechanical approach based on the Fermi's golden rule, the mode expansion method is used to calculate the excitation efficiency. In the classical electromagnetic approach, the spectral power density calculated by the point dipole model is fitted by the summation of the Lorentzian line shape functions, which provide the excitation probability of each waveguide and surface plasmon modes. The mode coupling efficiencies on the basis of the two approaches are calculated in a bottom-emitting OLED when the position of a dipole emitter is varied. By comparing the calculation results, we confirm the equivalence of two approaches and obtain the better optical interpretation to the calculated excitation efficiency of waveguide and surface plasmon modes. The ratio of mode excitation efficiencies calculated by two approaches agrees well with each other except the contribution of the near-field absorption component.
我们从理论上比较了有机发光二极管(OLED)的量子力学光学模型和经典电磁光学模型中波导模式与表面等离激元模式的激发效率。需要一个结合这两种方法的复杂光学模型,以获得准确的计算结果,并全面理解OLED中的微腔效应。在基于费米黄金规则的量子力学方法中,使用模式展开法来计算激发效率。在经典电磁方法中,由点偶极子模型计算出的光谱功率密度通过洛伦兹线形函数的总和进行拟合,这些函数提供了每个波导模式和表面等离激元模式的激发概率。当偶极子发射器的位置变化时,在底部发射OLED中计算基于这两种方法的模式耦合效率。通过比较计算结果,我们证实了两种方法的等效性,并对计算出的波导模式和表面等离激元模式的激发效率获得了更好的光学解释。除了近场吸收分量的贡献外,两种方法计算出的模式激发效率之比彼此吻合得很好。