Wiedermann Christian J
UMIT - Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik, Hall in Tirol, Österreich.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Dec;139:53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
Medical textbooks are important throughout postgraduate internship, residency and fellowship programs but authors' conflicts of interest (COI) are rarely disclosed. In anesthesiology, two high-profile cases of research fraud/unethical publishing have previously been identified. This study evaluated whether anesthesiology textbooks in German include controversial recommendations on hydroxyethyl starch (HES) and whether authors had undisclosed COI.
Forty-five anesthesiology, critical care, and emergency medicine electronic textbooks (January 2015-August 2017) were identified on the websites of German, Austrian, and Swiss publishers. Six textbooks were excluded (irrelevant content; compilation of peer-reviewed articles). Content on HES ('Kolloid', 'Hydroxyäthylstärke', 'Hydroxyethylstärke', 'HES', 'HAES') and COI ('Interessenkonflikt') was electronically searched; subject lists were manually searched. Recommendations on HES were analyzed in the context of indications/warnings/international guidelines. Potential COI for authors of controversial recommendations were searched on PubMed/EMBASE (January 2016-May 2018).
COI statements were absent in 38/39 textbooks (present for 1/553 authors; 0.2 %). Twelve textbooks did not discuss HES for volume resuscitation. HES was recommended in 13 textbooks; many recommendations were controversial (10/39 textbooks, 26 %; 25/553 authors, 5 %). Journal COI statements were available for 18/25 authors; 7 authors had financial/other COI, including 4/18 (22 %) with ties to HES manufacturers.
Recommendations on volume resuscitation with HES are highly controversial in German-language electronic textbooks; about one-quarter of relevant textbooks are inconsistent with regulatory authority or international guideline criteria. Undisclosed potential COI of textbook authors making controversial recommendations of HES were frequent, linking roughly one in five authors to the HES-producing industry. Against this background, COI statements must become part of standard textbook publication ethics.
医学教科书在研究生实习、住院医师培训和专科医师培训项目中都很重要,但作者的利益冲突(COI)很少被披露。在麻醉学领域,此前已发现两起备受瞩目的研究欺诈/不道德出版案例。本研究评估德语麻醉学教科书中是否包含关于羟乙基淀粉(HES)的有争议建议,以及作者是否存在未披露的利益冲突。
在德国、奥地利和瑞士出版商的网站上识别出45本麻醉学、重症医学和急诊医学电子教科书(2015年1月至2017年8月)。排除6本教科书(内容不相关;同行评审文章汇编)。通过电子搜索关于HES(“胶体”、“羟乙基淀粉”、“Hydroxyäthylstärke”、“Hydroxyethylstärke”、“HES”、“HAES”)和利益冲突(“Interessenkonflikt”)的内容;手动搜索主题列表。在适应证/警告/国际指南的背景下分析关于HES的建议。在PubMed/EMBASE上搜索有争议建议的作者的潜在利益冲突(2016年1月至2018年5月)。
39本教科书中有38本没有利益冲突声明(553位作者中有1位有声明;0.2%)。12本教科书未讨论HES用于容量复苏的情况。13本教科书推荐使用HES;许多建议存在争议(39本教科书中有10本,26%;553位作者中有25位,5%)。18/25位作者有期刊利益冲突声明;7位作者有财务/其他利益冲突,其中4/18(22%)与HES制造商有关联。
在德语电子教科书中,关于使用HES进行容量复苏的建议极具争议;约四分之一的相关教科书与监管机构或国际指南标准不一致。提出关于HES有争议建议的教科书作者存在未披露的潜在利益冲突的情况很常见,大约五分之一的作者与HES生产行业有关联。在此背景下,利益冲突声明必须成为标准教科书出版道德规范的一部分。