Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences.
Psychol Assess. 2019 Feb;31(2):271-276. doi: 10.1037/pas0000670. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) was designed as a measure of executive functioning and is commonly used in the assessment of psychiatric disorders. The original WCST, consisting of 128 cards, has been criticized as being too lengthy for patients experiencing significant distress. Consequently, a shortened version consisting of a single 64-card deck (WCST-64) was created. The purpose of this study was to examine the comparability of the WCST and WCST-64 in 99 patients with first-episode psychosis. Findings showed the WCST-64 yielded a mean score for perseverative responses (PR) that was 4.08 points lower than the corresponding variable from the WCST, and the correlation between the variables was = .65. The mean discrepancy was only 2.34 for nonperseverative error (NPE) scores and the correlation was also stronger, = .82. Nearly half the sample (44%) had a score discrepancy between the respective PR indexes that was greater than 1 whereas this discrepancy was observed in only 4% of the sample for NPE. Based on a cut point of < 40T to define impaired versus normal performance for PR, 80% of the sample received the same classification. These findings suggest that NPE scores may be comparable across both tests. Conversely, whereas the PR score from the WCST-64 and WCST can be used as a gross measure of impairment, this score should not be used interchangeably to characterize the severity of perseverative tendencies in first-episode patients on a case-by-case basis. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)旨在衡量执行功能,常用于精神疾病的评估。原始的 WCST 由 128 张卡片组成,由于患者体验到明显的痛苦,因此被批评为太长。因此,创建了一个由单个 64 张卡片组成的缩短版本(WCST-64)。本研究旨在检验首发精神病患者 99 例中 WCST 和 WCST-64 的可比性。研究结果表明,WCST-64 的持续性反应(PR)平均得分比 WCST 的相应变量低 4.08 分,两个变量之间的相关性为 r=0.65。非持续性错误(NPE)得分的平均差异仅为 2.34,相关性也更强,r=0.82。将近一半的样本(44%)在各自的 PR 指数之间存在差异>1,而在 NPE 中,只有 4%的样本存在这种差异。根据<40T 的切点定义 PR 的受损与正常表现,80%的样本得到相同的分类。这些发现表明,两种测试的 NPE 分数可能具有可比性。相反,虽然 WCST-64 和 WCST 的 PR 得分可以作为一种粗略的损伤衡量标准,但在个案基础上,不应将此分数互换用于描述首发患者的持续倾向的严重程度。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。