• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

威斯康星卡片分类测验和威斯康星卡片分类测验-64 在首发精神病评估中的可比性。

Comparability of the WCST and WCST-64 in the assessment of first-episode psychosis.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2019 Feb;31(2):271-276. doi: 10.1037/pas0000670. Epub 2018 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1037/pas0000670
PMID:30475009
Abstract

The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) was designed as a measure of executive functioning and is commonly used in the assessment of psychiatric disorders. The original WCST, consisting of 128 cards, has been criticized as being too lengthy for patients experiencing significant distress. Consequently, a shortened version consisting of a single 64-card deck (WCST-64) was created. The purpose of this study was to examine the comparability of the WCST and WCST-64 in 99 patients with first-episode psychosis. Findings showed the WCST-64 yielded a mean score for perseverative responses (PR) that was 4.08 points lower than the corresponding variable from the WCST, and the correlation between the variables was = .65. The mean discrepancy was only 2.34 for nonperseverative error (NPE) scores and the correlation was also stronger, = .82. Nearly half the sample (44%) had a score discrepancy between the respective PR indexes that was greater than 1 whereas this discrepancy was observed in only 4% of the sample for NPE. Based on a cut point of < 40T to define impaired versus normal performance for PR, 80% of the sample received the same classification. These findings suggest that NPE scores may be comparable across both tests. Conversely, whereas the PR score from the WCST-64 and WCST can be used as a gross measure of impairment, this score should not be used interchangeably to characterize the severity of perseverative tendencies in first-episode patients on a case-by-case basis. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)旨在衡量执行功能,常用于精神疾病的评估。原始的 WCST 由 128 张卡片组成,由于患者体验到明显的痛苦,因此被批评为太长。因此,创建了一个由单个 64 张卡片组成的缩短版本(WCST-64)。本研究旨在检验首发精神病患者 99 例中 WCST 和 WCST-64 的可比性。研究结果表明,WCST-64 的持续性反应(PR)平均得分比 WCST 的相应变量低 4.08 分,两个变量之间的相关性为 r=0.65。非持续性错误(NPE)得分的平均差异仅为 2.34,相关性也更强,r=0.82。将近一半的样本(44%)在各自的 PR 指数之间存在差异>1,而在 NPE 中,只有 4%的样本存在这种差异。根据<40T 的切点定义 PR 的受损与正常表现,80%的样本得到相同的分类。这些发现表明,两种测试的 NPE 分数可能具有可比性。相反,虽然 WCST-64 和 WCST 的 PR 得分可以作为一种粗略的损伤衡量标准,但在个案基础上,不应将此分数互换用于描述首发患者的持续倾向的严重程度。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Comparability of the WCST and WCST-64 in the assessment of first-episode psychosis.威斯康星卡片分类测验和威斯康星卡片分类测验-64 在首发精神病评估中的可比性。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Feb;31(2):271-276. doi: 10.1037/pas0000670. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
2
Validity of the WCST-64 after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后威斯康星卡片分类测验-64的效度
Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 May;17(2):153-8. doi: 10.1076/clin.17.2.153.16512.
3
Sensitivity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (64-Card Version) versus the Tower of London (Drexel Version) for detecting executive dysfunction in children with epilepsy.威斯康星卡片分类测验(64 张卡片版本)与伦敦塔测验(德雷克塞尔版本)对检测癫痫患儿执行功能障碍的敏感性比较
Child Neuropsychol. 2018 Apr;24(3):354-369. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2016.1265101. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
4
Validity of the WCST-64 after traumatic brain injury in children.儿童创伤性脑损伤后威斯康星卡片分类测验-64的效度
Clin Neuropsychol. 2004 Dec;18(4):521-7. doi: 10.1080/11385404049052411.
5
Normative scores of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in a sample of the adult Portuguese population.葡萄牙成年人群样本中威斯康星卡片分类测验的常模分数。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022 Jul-Aug;29(4):767-774. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2020.1810040. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
6
Use of the WCST and the WCST-64 in the assessment of traumatic brain injury.威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)及威斯康星卡片分类测验-64(WCST-64)在创伤性脑损伤评估中的应用。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003 Jun;25(4):512-20. doi: 10.1076/jcen.25.4.512.13877.
7
Wisconsin card sorting test as a measure of executive function impairments in stroke patients.威斯康星卡片分类测验作为中风患者执行功能障碍的一项测量指标。
Appl Neuropsychol. 2010 Oct;17(4):267-77. doi: 10.1080/09084282.2010.525104.
8
Validity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in patients with stroke.威斯康星卡片分类测验在中风患者中的效度
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Aug;40(16):1967-1971. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1323020. Epub 2017 May 11.
9
[Clinical utility of the 64-card version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in patients with traumatic brain injury].[威斯康星卡片分类测验64卡片版在创伤性脑损伤患者中的临床应用]
Rev Neurol. 2008;46(3):142-6.
10
Demographically adjusted normative data for the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test-64 item: Results from the Neuropsychological Norms for the U.S.-Mexico Border Region in Spanish (NP-NUMBRS) project.威斯康星卡片分类测验-64 项的人口统计学调整常模数据:来自美国-墨西哥边境地区西班牙语神经心理常模项目(NP-NUMBRS)的结果。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2021 Feb;35(2):339-355. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2019.1703042. Epub 2020 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex Differences in the Antidepressant and Neurocognitive Effects of Nonconvulsive Electrotherapy in Patients with Treatment-Refractory Depression.难治性抑郁症患者非惊厥性电疗法的抗抑郁和神经认知效应中的性别差异
Alpha Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 1;25(1):68-74. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.231402. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Different aspects of cognitive function in adult patients with moyamoya disease and its clinical subtypes.成人烟雾病患者及其临床亚型认知功能的不同方面。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2020 Mar 25;5(1):86-96. doi: 10.1136/svn-2019-000309. eCollection 2020.