Edward Hines Jr. Veterans Affairs Hospital.
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago.
Psychol Serv. 2020 Nov;17(4):405-413. doi: 10.1037/ser0000313. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
Although common practice in Veterans Affairs (VA) PTSD clinics, it is unclear whether preparatory treatment improves trauma-focused treatment (TFT) completion and outcomes. Furthermore, little is known about whether treatment-seeking veterans in naturalistic settings would chose to prioritize preparatory treatment if given the option of a phase-based approach or direct access to TFT, and how substance-related problems (SRPs) influence this treatment choice. The first aim of this study was to explore how co-occurring SRPs (ranging from none to moderate/severe) influence PTSD treatment choices in a naturalistic setting where veterans were offered a choice between a phase-based approach (i.e., preparatory treatment) or direct access to TFT. The study also examined whether initial treatment choice and severity of co-occurring SRPs influenced TFT completion and outcomes. The second aim was to investigate whether preparatory treatment led to superior TFT completion or outcomes, irrespective of co-occurring SRPs. Analyses were conducted using archival data from 737 United States veterans referred for outpatient VA PTSD treatment. SRPs did not predict initial treatment choice or the length of preparatory group participation. Neither SRPs nor preparatory group participation predicted TFT completion or outcomes (measured as change in PTSD and depression symptoms from pre- to post-TFT). Preparatory group participation did not predict improved TFT completion or outcomes, irrespective of co-occurring SRPs. These findings suggest that veterans with PTSD symptoms and co-occurring SRPs may make similar treatment choices and benefit from either a phase-based approach or direct TFT initiation, and preparatory treatments may not increase patient readiness for veterans seeking TFT. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
虽然这在退伍军人事务部 (VA) PTSD 诊所中很常见,但目前尚不清楚预备治疗是否会提高以创伤为中心的治疗 (TFT) 的完成率和效果。此外,对于在自然环境中寻求治疗的退伍军人,如果有基于阶段的方法或直接接受 TFT 的选择,他们是否会选择优先进行预备治疗,以及物质相关问题 (SRPs) 如何影响这种治疗选择,人们知之甚少。本研究的第一个目的是探讨在自然环境中,当退伍军人在基于阶段的方法(即预备治疗)和直接接受 TFT 之间进行选择时,共病的 SRPs(从无到中度/重度不等)如何影响 PTSD 治疗选择。该研究还检查了初始治疗选择和共病 SRPs 的严重程度是否会影响 TFT 的完成率和效果。第二个目的是研究预备治疗是否会导致 TFT 完成率或效果的提高,而与共病的 SRPs 无关。分析使用了 737 名美国退伍军人接受门诊退伍军人事务部 PTSD 治疗的档案数据进行。SRPs 并未预测初始治疗选择或预备组参与的时间。无论是 SRPs 还是预备组的参与都没有预测 TFT 的完成率或效果(以 PTSD 和抑郁症状从 TFT 前到后的变化来衡量)。预备组的参与与共病 SRPs 无关,也不能预测 TFT 完成率或效果的提高。这些发现表明,患有 PTSD 症状和共病 SRPs 的退伍军人可能会做出类似的治疗选择,无论是基于阶段的方法还是直接启动 TFT 都可能从中受益,并且预备治疗可能不会增加寻求 TFT 的退伍军人对治疗的准备程度。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。