Suppr超能文献

改良日本矫形外科学会严重程度分级对颈椎脊髓病择期手术后 12 个月结局满意度的影响。

Effect of Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Severity Classifications on Satisfaction With Outcomes 12 Months After Elective Surgery for Cervical Spine Myelopathy.

机构信息

Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, NC.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jun 1;44(11):801-808. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002946.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

This study retrospectively analyzes prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVE

Here, we aim to determine the influence of preoperative and 12-month modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) on satisfaction and understand the change in mJOA severity classification after surgical management of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

DCM is a progressive degenerative spine disease resulting from cervical cord compression. The natural progression of DCM is variable; some patients experience periods of stability, while others rapidly deteriorate following disease onset. The mJOA is commonly used to grade and categorize myelopathy symptoms, but its association with postoperative satisfaction has not been previously explored.

METHODS

The quality and outcomes database (QOD) was queried for patients undergoing elective surgery for DCM. Patients were divided into mild (≥14), moderate (9 to 13), or severe (<9) categories on the mJOA scores. A McNemar-Bowker test was used to assess whether a significant proportion of patients changed mJOA category between preoperative and 12 months postoperative. A multivariable proportional odds ordinal logistic regression model was fitted with 12-month satisfaction as the outcome of interest.

RESULTS

We identified 1963 patients who underwent elective surgery for DCM and completed 12-months follow-ups. Comparing mJOA severity level preoperatively and at 12 months revealed that 55% remained in the same category, 37% improved, and 7% moved to a worse category. After adjusting for baseline and surgery-specific variables, the 12-month mJOA category had the highest impact on patient satisfaction (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patient satisfaction is an indispensable tool for measuring quality of care after spine surgery. In this sample, 12-month mJOA category, regardless of preop mJOA, was significantly correlated with satisfaction. Given these findings, it is important to advise patients of the probability that surgery will change their mJOA severity classification and the changes required to achieve postoperative satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

研究设计

本研究回顾性分析了前瞻性收集的数据。

目的

本研究旨在确定术前和 12 个月改良日本矫形协会(mJOA)评分对满意度的影响,并了解退行性颈椎脊髓病(DCM)手术治疗后 mJOA 严重程度分类的变化。

背景资料概要

DCM 是一种由颈髓受压引起的进行性退行性脊柱疾病。DCM 的自然进展是多变的;一些患者经历稳定期,而另一些患者在疾病发作后迅速恶化。mJOA 常用于分级和分类脊髓病症状,但它与术后满意度的关系尚未被探索。

方法

在 QOD 中查询接受退行性颈椎脊髓病择期手术的患者。根据 mJOA 评分,患者被分为轻度(≥14)、中度(9 至 13)或重度(<9)。使用 McNemar-Bowker 检验评估术前和术后 12 个月间 mJOA 分类是否有显著比例的患者发生变化。使用多变量比例优势有序逻辑回归模型,以 12 个月满意度为因变量进行拟合。

结果

我们共纳入 1963 例接受退行性颈椎脊髓病择期手术且完成 12 个月随访的患者。比较术前和术后 12 个月的 mJOA 严重程度水平,发现 55%的患者仍处于同一类别,37%的患者改善,7%的患者恶化。在调整基线和手术特定变量后,12 个月 mJOA 类别对患者满意度的影响最大(P<0.001)。

结论

患者满意度是衡量脊柱手术后护理质量的不可或缺的工具。在本样本中,无论术前 mJOA 如何,12 个月 mJOA 类别与满意度显著相关。鉴于这些发现,重要的是要告知患者手术可能改变其 mJOA 严重程度分类以及获得术后满意度所需的变化的可能性。

证据等级

3。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验