Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Department of Geography, National University of Singapore, 1 Arts Link, Singapore, 117570, Singapore.
Ecol Appl. 2019 Jan;29(1):e01810. doi: 10.1002/eap.1810. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
To date, discourse associated with the potential application of "blue carbon" within real-world carbon markets has focused on blue carbon as a mitigation strategy in the context of avoided deforestation (e.g., REDD+). Here, we report structural dynamics and carbon storage gains from mangrove sites that have undergone rehabilitation to ascertain whether reforestation can complement conservation activities and warrant project investment. Replicated sites at two locations with contrasting geomorphic conditions were selected, Tiwoho and Tanakeke on the island of Sulawesi, Indonesia. These locations are representative of high (Tiwoho, deep muds and silty substrates) and low (Tanakeke, shallow, coralline sands) productivity mangrove ecosystems. They share a similar management history of clearing and conversion for aquaculture before restorative activities were undertaken using the practice of Ecological Mangrove Rehabilitation (EMR). Species diversity and mean biomass carbon storage gains after 10 yr of regrowth from the high productivity sites of Tiwoho (49.2 ± 9.1 Mg C·ha ·yr ) are already almost of one-third of mean biomass stocks exhibited by mature forests (167.8 ± 30.3 Mg C·ha ·yr ). Tiwoho's EMR sites, on average, will have offset all biomass C that was initially lost through conversion within the next 11 yr, a finding in marked contrast to the minimal carbon gains observed on the low productivity, low diversity, coral atoll EMR sites of Tanakeke (1.1 ± 0.4 Mg C·ha ·yr ). These findings highlight the importance of geomorphic and biophysical site selection if the primary purpose of EMR is intended to maximize carbon sequestration gains.
截至目前,与现实世界碳市场中“蓝碳”潜在应用相关的讨论主要集中在蓝碳作为避免毁林(如 REDD+)情景下的一种缓解策略。在此,我们报告了经过修复的红树林地点的结构动态和碳储存增益,以确定造林是否可以补充保护活动并值得项目投资。选择了两个地理位置具有对比性的地点(印度尼西亚苏拉威西岛的 Tiwoho 和 Tanakeke)开展了复制实验,这两个地点分别代表高生产力(Tiwoho,深泥和粉质基质)和低生产力(Tanakeke,浅海,珊瑚砂)的红树林生态系统。它们具有相似的管理历史,即都经历过为水产养殖而进行的开垦和转化,然后才采用生态红树林修复(EMR)实践进行恢复。在高生产力的 Tiwoho 地点,经过 10 年的再生后,物种多样性和平均生物量碳存储增益(49.2 ± 9.1 Mg C·ha·yr)已经接近成熟林平均生物量存量(167.8 ± 30.3 Mg C·ha·yr)的三分之一。Tiwoho 的 EMR 地点,平均而言,将在接下来的 11 年内抵消最初因转化而损失的所有生物量 C,这一发现与在低生产力、低多样性的珊瑚环礁 EMR 地点 Tanakeke 观察到的最小碳增益形成鲜明对比(1.1 ± 0.4 Mg C·ha·yr)。这些发现强调了地貌和生物物理选址的重要性,如果 EMR 的主要目的是最大限度地增加碳封存增益的话。